Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 256/94 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1994:CPG.256.94 AI generated

Appeal allowed; bankruptcy court must refer to the creditor who revoked the claim under ZPPSL 1989.

Case Number VSM sklep Cpg 256/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court allowed the appeal against the first-instance bankruptcy court's decision to refer the claim to the debtor. The upholder had already obtained an enforceable title for the claim, which was subsequently revoked by a specific creditor. The court ruled that because the factual basis of the claim is not disputed, the bankruptcy court must refer the matter to the entity that revoked the claim pursuant to Article 127, Paragraph 2 of the ZPPSL 1989.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

II. odst. 127. člen ZPPSL iz leta 1989; When a bankruptcy claim has an enforceable title that has been revoked, the bankruptcy court must refer the matter to the revoking creditor if the factual basis is undisputed.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy proceedings revoked claim enforceable title ZPPSL 1989 procedural referral undisputed facts appeal decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
II. odst. 127. člen ZPPSL iz leta 1989
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cpg 42/2011
Appeal allowed; claim for annulment of corporate resolutions is not a bankruptcy claim requiring declaration. Court found first instance misapplied bankruptcy law regarding claim declaration. Claimant must now prove standing under company law despite bankruptcy. Appeal allowed; claim for annulment of corporate resolutions is not a bankruptcy claim requiring declaration. Court found first instance misapplied bankruptcy law regarding claim declaration. Claimant must now prove standing under company law despite bankruptcy.
VSM sklep Cpg 58/96
Appeal dismissed; bankruptcy administrator must refer disputed claims to court per Insolvency Act.
VSL sklep II Cpg 370/2000
Appeal allowed; first instance court erred by ruling on debtor's defense without evidence under enforcement law.
VSK sklep Cpg 203/99
Court dismisses debtor's appeal on enforcement of reliable document due to unproven and unexplained objection.
VSL sklep II Cpg 1098/99
Appeal allowed; objection dismissed because debtor failed to specify evidence for quantity claim.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožbi se ugodi in se sklep sodišča prve stopnje opr. št. St ... z dne ... spremeni tako, da se v roku osem dni od vročitve tega sklepa napoti na postopek za ugotovitev prerekane terjatve v znesku 51.349,00 sit -stečajni dolžnik.

[JEDRO]

Iz prijavljene terjatve stečajnega upnika je razvidno, da je upnik prijavil terjatev za katero že ima izvršili naslov - izvršilni sklep po verodostojni listini TS M opr. št. ... . V takem primeru mora stečajno sodišče napotiti na ugotovitveni postopek tistega, ki je prerekal - II.odst.127. člena ZPPSL iz leta 1989.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Stečajni upnik se je pravočasno pritožil zoper sklep prvostopnega sodišča, ki je upnika zaradi ugotovitve obstoja dela prijavljene terjatve, napotilo na pravdo.

Pritožba je utemeljena.

Iz prijavljene terjatve stečajnega upnika (glej pomožni spis s prijavljenimi terjatvami pod red. št. 11) je razvidno, da je upnik prijavil terjatev za katero že ima izvršili naslov - izvršilni sklep po verodostojni listini TS M opr. št. ... . V takem primeru mora stečajno sodišče napotiti na ugotovitveni postopek tistega, ki je prerekal - II.odst.127. člena ZPPSL iz leta 1989. Ker dejansko stanje o temelju prijavljene terjatve ni sporno, je pritožbeno sodišče samo spremenilo izpodbijani sklep.