Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 469/93 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1994:CPG.469.93 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; creditor failed to correct execution request defects, triggering statutory process consequences under ZPP.

Case Number VSM sklep Cpg 469/93
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the creditor's appeal against the first-instance court's decision to reject the execution request. The creditor had only partially corrected the request by translating documents but failed to fix critical errors regarding the debtor's name and account details. Consequently, the court validly applied the procedural consequence stipulated in Article 109, paragraph 4 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 109, paragraph 4 of the Civil Procedure Act; If an execution request contains material defects that prevent its processing and the applicant fails to correct them within the prescribed period, the court may reject the request and apply the statutory procedural consequence.

Keywords

AI generated
execution request rejection material defects correction Civil Procedure Act procedural consequence creditor appeal dismissal translation requirement debtor identification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 109, paragraph 4 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL sklep II Ip 3249/2010
Appeal granted; court held late submission of data before sanction is valid under execution law.
VSL sklep III Cp 947/99
Appeal dismissed because procedural errors regarding court address cannot justify time limit extensions under ZIZ Art. 36.
VSK sklep II Cpg 204/2005
Creditor's appeal dismissed; court order upheld for failing to correct debtor name per public register.
VSC Sklep I Ip 281/2021
Appeal dismissed because enforcement petition failed to include debtor's residence as required by ZIZ. The court upheld the first instance rejection due to procedural non-compliance.
VSL sklep III Cp 164/2000
Appeal allowed: Final enforcement ruling precludes rejection of enforcement request due to minor title defects.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne kot neutemeljena in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Prvostopno sodišče je s sklepom pozvalo upnika, da v roku 8 dni popravi izvršilni predlog zaradi več pomanjkljivosti. Upnik je sledil zahtevi le glede prevoda v slovenski jezik. Zato je prvostopno sodišče utemeljeno uporabilo procesno posledico iz 4.odst. 109. člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je s sklepom zavrglo izvršilni predlog, ker upnik ni v roku navedel pravilnega naziva dolžnika, dolžnikovega žiro računa in upnikov nerezidenčni račun. Zoper ta sklep je upnik vložil pravočasno pritožbo, v kateri navaja, da je vrnil izv. predlog in priložene račune prevedene v slovenski jezik.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Prvostopno sodišče je s sklepom pozvalo upnika, da v roku 8 dni popravi izvršilni predlog zaradi več pomanjkljivosti. Upnik je sledil zahtevi le glede prevoda v slovenski jezik. Zato je prvostopno sodišče utemeljeno uporabilo procesno posledico iz 4.odst. 109. člena ZPP.

Izrek o pritožbenih stroških je odpadel, ker jih pritožnik ni priglasil.