Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 540/93 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1994:CPG.540.93 AI generated

Appeal allowed; bankruptcy court has exclusive territorial jurisdiction over disputes arising from bankruptcy proceedings.

Case Number VSM sklep Cpg 540/93
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court revoked the first-instance court's decision to handle the case in a judicial proceeding and remanded it for new consideration. The creditor argued the lower court failed to designate the bankruptcy court as the proper venue, while the debtor contested the bankruptcy's validity. The court ruled that disputes arising from bankruptcy proceedings fall exclusively under the jurisdiction of the court conducting the bankruptcy, necessitating a remand rather than a direct ruling on the objection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

63. člen ZPP; Disputes arising from or related to bankruptcy proceedings are exclusively within the territorial jurisdiction of the court conducting the bankruptcy proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy proceedings territorial jurisdiction exclusive competence creditor rights remand for new trial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
63. člen ZPP
AI generated
VSL sklep II Cpg 1251/99
Appeal dismissed; court cannot review factual disputes on debt termination in enforcement appeal.
VSL sklep II Cpg 440/2000
Appeal dismissed; court upheld enforcement order where debtor raised valid set-off defense requiring judicial review.
VSC Sklep II Ip 155/2021
Appeal dismissed; court reviews only reasonableness of objection under ZIZ Art. 62, not merits.
VSL sklep III Cp 1474/2002
Appeal allowed; court must rule on partial execution suspension before addressing objection to execution order.
VSL sklep I R 64/2013
Court dismisses jurisdiction objection, ruling Okrajno sodišče competent for low-value dispute against public fund.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožbi se ugodi in se sklep sodišča I. stopnje opr. št. III Ig 2072/93-5 z dne 23.9.1993 razveljavi in vrne sodišču I. stopnje v novo odločanje.

[JEDRO]

Po določilu 63. člena ZPP je za sojenje v sporih, ki nastanejo med ali zaradi stečajnega postopka izključno krajevno pristojno sodišče, ki opravlja stečajni postopek

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Po ugovoru dolžnika je sodišče I. stopnje razveljavilo sklep o dovolitvi izvršbe na podlagi verodostojne listine in odločilo, da bo zadeva obravnavana v pravdnem postopku. Zoper tak sklep se je upnik pravočasno pritožil, češ da sodišče v sklepu ni določilo o odstopu zadeve krajevno pristojnemu sodišču.

Pritožba je utemeljena.

Iz izvršilnega predloga je razvidno, da je upnik - tožeča stranka v stečaju. Po določilu 63. člena ZPP je za sojenje v sporih, ki nastanejo med ali zaradi stečajnega postopka izključno krajevno pristojno sodišče, ki opravlja stečajni postopek - v konkretnem primeru je to sodišče v Celju. Sodišče o izključni krajevni pristojnosti v izpodbijanem sklepu ni odločilo.

Pritožbeno sodišče samo ni moglo s spremembo izpodbijanega sklepa odločiti o krajevni pristojnosti, saj bi s tem onemogočilo toženi stranki - dolžniku event. pritožbo, da je navedba o stečaju napačna.

Zato je bilo potrebno odločiti kot je razvidno iz izreka.