Appeal dismissed because the appellant was not a party to the enforcement proceeding.
Slovenia (SI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the appeal lodged by company XY against a decision to revoke an enforcement ruling. Although the debtor M. had filed an objection and the lower court treated the enforcement order as a claim, XY was not a party to the original enforcement proceedings. The appellate court ruled that since XY lacked standing as a party, the appeal was inadmissible under Article 367 of the Code of Civil Procedure, rather than being reviewed under Article 358.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedčlen 358 ZPP; člen 367 ZPP: An appeal is inadmissible if the appellant is not a party to the enforcement proceedings, requiring dismissal under Article 367 rather than Article 358 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Pritožba se kot nedovoljena zavrže.
[JEDRO]
Pritožba ni dovoljena, če pritožnik ni stranka v tej izvršilni zadevi.
[OBRAZLOŽITEV]
Upnik je vložil izvršilni predlog zoper dolžnika M., ki je zoper izvršilni sklep vložil ugovor. Zoper sklep o razveljavitvi izvršilnega dovolila in obravnavanje predloga kot tožbe, je vložilo pritožbo podjetje XY.
Pritožba ni dovoljena, saj XY ni stranka v tej izvršilni zadevi. Zato jo je ob reševanju pritožbe moralo zavreči sodišče II. stopnje po določilih člena 367 ZPP , ko tega ni storilo po členu 358 ZPP že sodišče I. stopnje.