Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 205/93 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1993:CPG.205.93 AI generated

Court allows appeal against court fee order, voiding collection due to non-enforceable penalty fee.

Case Number VSM sklep Cpg 205/93
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court granted the creditor's appeal and revoked the first-instance court's order for fee collection. The creditor had paid the regular and reminder fees but submitted proof only during the appeal, missing the deadline for the penalty fee. The court ruled that while a 10% penalty fee was theoretically due under the Court Fees Act, it amounts to only 35 SIT and is explicitly non-enforceable under Article 31 of the same act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

člen 29/IV ZST; člen 31 ZST: A penalty fee for late submission of fee payment proof is non-enforceable if its amount is fixed at 35 SIT, rendering the entire fee collection order voidable upon successful appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
court fees penalty fee non-enforceable fee collection appeal procedure ZST revocation of order

Cited Legislation

AI generated
člen 29/IV ZST
31. člen ZST
AI generated
VSM sklep Cpg 323/93
Court allows appeal against tax collection order, ruling foreign residents have 90 days to pay.
VSM sklep Cpg 9/93
Court dismisses enforcement of late court fees when taxpayer proves timely payment within 15 days.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 832/2019
Appeal dismissed; court held plaintiff's appeal withdrawn due to insufficient court fee payment per ZPP Art. 105a(3).
VSM sklep Cpg 256/95
Appeal granted; court stops collection of penalty fine due to statute of limitations despite unpaid confirmation.
VSM sklep Cpg 360/92
Court dismisses appeal when lower court undercharges court fees, ruling defendant owes more based on correct point values.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožbi se ugodi in se sklep sodišča prve stopnje opr. št. I Ig 134/92-7 z dne 30.4.1993 spremeni tako, da se sklep razveljavi in izterjava sodne takse ustavi.

[JEDRO]

Ker je upnik šele v pritožbi priložil bančno potrdilo o plačilu redne in opominske takse bi sicer moral po določilu člena 29/IV ZST plačati 10%-no kazensko takso, ker ni v roku predložil sodišču potrdila o plačani taksi, vendar ta kazenska taksa znese samo 35,00 sit in se po določilu 31. člena cit. zakona ne izterja.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Upnik se je pravočasno pritožil zoper sklep o izterjavi redne, opominske in kazenske takse. V pritožbi je navedel, da je redno in opominsko takso plačal.

Pritožba je utemeljena.

Upnik je šele pritožbi priložil bančno potrdilo o plačilu redne in opominske takse. Tako ni razloga za plačilo kazenske takse, kakor tudi ne za izterjavo redne in opominske takse. Upnik bi sicer moral po določilu člena 29/IV ZST plačati 10%-no kazensko takso, ker ni v roku predložil sodišču potrdila o plačani taksi, vendat ta kazenska taksa znese samo 35,00 sit in se po določilu 31. člena cit. zakona ne izterja.

Zato je pritožbeno sodišče izpodbilani sklep razveljavilo in izterjavo ustavilo.