Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSK sklep Cp 165/99 ECLI:SI:VSKP:1999:CP.165.99 AI generated

Court dismisses debtor's appeal for enforcement objection filed after the eight-day legal deadline expired.

Case Number VSK sklep Cp 165/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court rejected the debtor's appeal against the first-instance decision, confirming the lower court's ruling. The debtor argued that the creditor unjustly demanded legal fees, but the court found the objection inadmissible because it was filed after the statutory eight-day deadline had passed. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as untimely, and the original enforcement order stood.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju (ZIZ) 15. člen; Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) 368. in 380. člen: An objection to an enforcement decision based on a credible document must be filed within eight days; failure to meet this deadline renders the objection inadmissible and the appeal against the rejection thereof must be dismissed.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement objection statutory deadline timely filing creditor's claim legal fees dispute procedural inadmissibility enforcement proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
15. člen Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju (ZIZ)
368. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
380. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
AI generated
VSL sklep II Ip 507/2010
Appeal dismissed; debtor filed objection late in bill of exchange enforcement case where shorter deadline applied.
VSC Sklep II Ip 154/2022
Appeal dismissed; service by deposit determines deadline, not deposit day itself.
VSL sklep Cpg 496/95
Appeal dismissed; postal receipt by authorized agent deemed valid public document unless proven otherwise.
Sklep III Ips 60/2010
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for invalid execution when objection period expired and merits already decided.
VSL sklep II Cpg 1/2003
Appeal allowed; service defect due to missing recipient relationship on delivery note invalidates deemed service.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožbo dolžnika se zavrne in p o t r d i sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Ugovor, ki ga dolžnik vloži proti sklepu o izvršbi na podlagi verodostojne listine po preteku 8-dnevnega roka, se zavrže.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrglo dolžnikov ugovor proti sklepu o izvršbi, ker je bil vložen po preteku osemdnevnega zakonskega roka.

Dolžnik se pritožuje proti navedenem sklepu in v laični pritožbi pojasnjuje, da upnik neutemeljeno zahteva plačilo odvetniškega honorarja v zvezi z zastopanjem v sodnem postopku.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Sodišče prve stopnje je pravilno zavrglo ugovor, ki je bil vložen dne .... Dolžnik je namreč prejel sklep o izvršbi dne ... in je zato zakonski rok za vložitev ugovora potekel dne .... Pritožbeno sodišče je zavrnilo neutemeljeno pritožbo in potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje v skladu z določbami 15. čl. Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju (ZIZ) ter 368. in 380. čl. Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP).