Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSC sklep I Ip 29/2008 ECLI:SI:VSCE:2008:I.IP.29.2008 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal; costs claim barred by missed 30-day objective deadline under ZIZ since last enforcement act.

Case Number VSC sklep I Ip 29/2008
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court rejected the creditor's appeal regarding additional enforcement costs claimed in March 2007. The creditor argued the 30-day objective deadline had not expired because enforcement proceedings were not suspended, but the court found the deadline ran from the last enforcement act on April 18, 2005, which was never executed. Consequently, the claim was time-barred as the creditor waited over a year to file the costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

čl. 38/VII ZIZ: The 30-day objective deadline for claiming enforcement costs runs from the date of the last enforcement act if proceedings are not suspended; mere non-suspension does not extend the period if no acts occur thereafter.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement costs objective deadline ZIZ article 38 time bar enforcement act procedural deadline creditor claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
čl. 38/VII ZIZ
Zmotno je stališče upnika, da rok teče le od ustavitve postopka, ampak je relevanten tudi datum, po katerem ni bilo več nobenega izvršilnega dejanja (čl. 38/VII ZIZ)
AI generated
VSC Sklep I Ip 322/2022
Appeal allowed; first instance dismissed due to lack of reasons for rejecting enforcement agent's fee claims.
VSC Sklep I Ip 296/2020
Appeal allowed; court reversed first instance rejection of enforcement costs due to procedural error.
VSK sklep II Ip 944/2010
Appeal against enforcement costs ruling dismissed due to pending objection to enforcement order.
VSL sklep I Cpg 1003/2006
Tenant appeal allowed; landlord's claim for costs rejected as termination is not a 'success' under ZPP.
VSC sklep I Ip 51/2010
Appeal dismissed; creditor must declare enforcement costs immediately, not within 30 days of case closure.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

Pritožnik sam trpi pritožbene stroške.

[JEDRO]

Objektivni rok se šteje od zadnjega izvršilnega dejanja, če postopek ni že prej ustavljen.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

V izpodbijanem delu sklepa sodišče upniku ni priznalo dodatno priglašenih stroškov z dne 20. 3. 2007 v znesku 14.129,28 SIT.

Proti takšnemu sklepu se je pritožil upnik in se zavzema za spoštovanje 30-dnevnega objektivnega roka, ker izvršba še ni bila končana ali ustavljena in meni, da so bili zato stroški pravočasno priglašeni.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Sodišče je pravilno ugotovilo, da sta prekoračena tako subjektivni kot objektivni rok za priglasitev stroškov.

Prekoračen je namreč bil tudi 30-dnevni objektivni rok iz čl. 38/VII Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju (ZIZ). Zadnje izvršilno dejanje je bil predlagan ponoven rubež dne 18. 4. 2005, ki pa ni bil izveden. Po 18. 4. 2005 ni bilo več nobenega izvršilnega dejanja in je bil skrajni rok za priglasitev stroškov 18. 5. 2005.

Upnik pa je priglasil stroške šele 20. 3. 2007.

Zmotno je stališče upnika, da rok teče le od ustavitve postopka, ampak je relevanten tudi datum, po katerem ni bilo več nobenega izvršilnega dejanja (čl. 38/VII ZIZ)

Glede na zavrnitev pritožbe pritožnik sam trpi pritožbene stroške.