Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Cpg 852/2007 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2007:I.CPG.852.2007 AI generated

Small claims procedure appeal dismissed because only final decisions allow direct appeals.

Case Number VSL sklep I Cpg 852/2007
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's complaints against two intermediate rulings regarding a small claims case. The appellant argued for procedural review of the court's refusal to extend the filing deadline and to restore the case status. The court held that under the Civil Procedure Act, appeals in small claims are limited to final decisions, rendering these intermediate rulings unappealable.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZPP 447. člen; 365. člen: In small claims proceedings, appeals are permitted only against final decisions; intermediate rulings must be challenged via appeal against the final judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
small claims procedure intermediate rulings final decision requirement civil procedure act appeal admissibility procedural exhaustion cost allocation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
447. člen ZPP
365. člen ZPP
165. člen ZPP
154. člen ZPP
AI generated
Sklep VIII Ips 140/2004
Appeal against final disciplinary penalty decision dismissed as appeal against final judgment not permitted. Appeal against final dismissal also rejected due to lack of appeal right. Appeal against final judgment not permitted. Appeal against final dismissal also rejected due to lack of appeal right.
VSK sklep I Cpg 352/2006
Tax claim dismissed because specific property items were not clearly defined for separation from identical goods.
VDSS Sodba in sklep Psp 252/2022
Appeal dismissed; widow's pension claim rejected due to missed three-year statute of limitations and unchanged legal grounds.
VSL sklep I Cp 2426/2014
Court dismisses appeal for late court fee payment, ruling late payment cannot cure missed deadline.
Sklep I Up 296/2010
Appeal dismissed; late request for reinstatement rejected due to personal service on representative triggering deadline.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožbi se zavržeta.

Tožeča stranka sama nosi svoje pritožbene stroške.

[JEDRO]

V postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti je dovoljena pritožba samo zoper sklep, s katerim je postopek končan; druge sklepe, zoper katere je po določbah ZPP sicer dovoljena pritožba pa je mogoče izpodbijati samo s pritožbo zoper odločbo, s katero je končan postopek.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z uvodoma citiranim sklepom z dne 22.5.2007 je sodišče prve stopnje v sporu majhne vrednosti zavrnilo predlog tožeče stranke za podaljšanje roka za popravo tožbe. S sklepom z dne 20.6.2007 pa je zavrnilo tudi njen predlog za vrnitev v prejšnje stanje.

Tožeča stranka se je zoper oba sklepa pritožila.

Pritožbi nista dovoljeni.

V postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti je dovoljena posebna pritožba samo zoper sklep, s katerim je postopek končan; druge sklepe, zoper katere je po določbah ZPP sicer dovoljena pritožba, pa je mogoče izpodbijati samo s pritožbo zoper odločbo, s katero je končan postopek (1. in 2. odstavek 447. člena ZPP).

Z izpodbijanima sklepoma sodišče prve stopnje ni končalo postopka, prav tako pa v zadevi še ni izdalo končne odločbe, zato pritožbi nista dovoljeni in ju je pritožbeno sodišče zavrglo (1. točka 365. člena ZPP).

Izrek o stroških temelji na določbi 1. odstavka 165. člena v zvezi s 1. odstavkom 154. člena ZPP).