Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 717/95 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1997:II.IPS.717.95 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal as allowed by law without opposing party consent.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 717/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia issued a ruling to declare the withdrawal of the appeal effective. The appellant had filed an appeal against a second-instance judgment and later withdrew it via letter before the appellate court rendered a decision. The court held that under the Civil Procedure Act, a party may withdraw an appeal without the opposing party's consent once the appeal court has not yet issued its ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. odstavek 349. člena ZPP; 399. člen ZPP: A party may withdraw an appeal without the opposing party's consent once the appeal court has not yet issued its ruling, and the withdrawal becomes effective immediately upon receipt by the court.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal civil procedure act opposing party consent supreme court ruling effective immediately

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odstavek 349. člena ZPP
399. člen ZPP
AI generated
Sodba II Ips 34/2002
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; transfer agreements between non-heirs do not require strict inheritance law formalities.
Sodba II Ips 475/93
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal, allowing adverse possession claim after 20 years of good faith possession.
Sklep II Ips 44/96
Appeal partially allowed; court voids dismissal of appeal due to doubt over service of judgment on minor.
Sklep II Ips 88/93
Supreme Court quashes default judgment due to defendant's failure to receive summons eight days prior.
Sodba II Ips 488/2001
Appeal dismissed; cohabitation partner's financial contribution does not constitute legal support obligation under ZZZDR.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se umik revizije.

[JEDRO]

Po 2. odstavku 349. člena ZPP v zvezi s 399. členom ZPP lahko stranka, dokler revizijsko sodišče ne izda odločbe, umakne pravno sredstvo. Izjava o umiku učinkuje takoj, ko jo sodišče prejme. Privolitev nasprotne stranke ni potrebna.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku in razvezalo izročilno pogodbo z dne 3.12.1990 in dodatek z dne 12.12.1990, ki sta ju sklenili pravdni stranki, toženki pa naložilo, da izstavi listino, na podlagi katere bo mogoč zemljiškoknjižni vpis nepremičnin, ki so bile predmet izročilne pogodbe, na tožničino ime.

Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

Tožena stranka je dne 5.9.1995 vložila proti sodbi sodišča druge stopnje pravočasno revizijo, dne 14.9.1995 pa še dopolnitev revizije. Revizija je bila vročena Državnemu tožilstvu Republike Slovenije, ki se o njej ni izjavilo, in tožeči stranki, ki nanjo ni odgovorila (3. odstavek 390. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, v nadaljevanju ZPP). Tožena stranka je nato z dopisom z dne 14.3.1997 revizijo umaknila. Po 2. odstavku 349. člena ZPP v zvezi s 399. členom ZPP lahko stranka, dokler revizijsko sodišče ne izda odločbe, umakne pravno sredstvo. Izjava o umiku učinkuje takoj, ko jo sodišče prejme. Privolitev nasprotne stranke ni potrebna.

O reviziji tožene stranke revizijsko sodišče še ni odločalo, zato je umik revizije upoštevalo in to ugotovilo s sklepom.