Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 631/95 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1997:II.IPS.631.95 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal withdrawal as untimely, upholding first-instance judgment on debt claim.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 631/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the defendant's appeal withdrawal, ruling it untimely, and upheld the first-instance judgment. The first court ordered the defendant to pay 7,823 DEM to the plaintiff but rejected a higher claim, while the defendant later withdrew the appeal on December 31, 1996. The court rejected the withdrawal because the statutory deadline for such a procedural act had already passed, thereby confirming the original decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o parničnem postopku (ZPP); Umik revizije mora biti vložen v roku, ki ga določa zakon, sicer je neveljaven in sodišče ne more sprejeti umika po poteku roka.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal withdrawal statutory deadline procedural time limit first instance judgment court costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
390. člen ZPP
AI generated
Sodba III Ips 51/2001
Rental contract claim upheld; landlord need not prove ownership, only delivery of property for lease.
VSL Sodba II Cp 413/2018
Appeal dismissed; first instance court did not commit essential procedural violation by rejecting claim due to insufficient pleading.
Sklep in sodba III Ips 86/2002
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on contract interpretation, requiring active party duty in contractual law.
Sklep III Ips 1/2013
Appeal against second-instance dismissal is admissible; late filing due to lawyer's error is not excusable.
Sodba in sklep III Ips 15/95
Supreme Court partially allows maritime charterparty claim regarding extended port stay and demurrage calculations.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se umik revizije.

[JEDRO]

Tožena stranka je pisno sporočila, da revizijo umika.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je toženi stranki naložilo, da mora plačati tožeči stranki znesek 7.823,00 DEM v tolarski protivrednosti po srednjem tečaju Banke Slovenije na dan plačila z zamudnimi obrestmi po obrestni meri za devizne hranilne vloge v kraju izplačila, višji tožbeni zahtevek pa je zavrnilo. Pritožbo tožeče stranke je sodišče druge stopnje zavrglo kot prepozno, pritožbo tožene stranke pa zavrnilo kot neutemeljeno in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje potrdilo.

Proti tej sodbi je tožena stranka vložila revizijo zaradi bistvene kršitve določb pravdnega postopka in zmotne uporabe materialnega prava in predlagala razveljavitev sodb nižjih sodišč in vrnitev zadeve sodišču prve stopnje v novo sojenje.

Tožeča stranka je na revizijo odgovorila in predlagala njeno zavrnitev, tedanji Javni tožilec Republike Slovenije pa se o njej ni izjavil (tretji odstavek 390. člena ZPP).

Dne 31.12.1996 pa je tožena stranka pisno sporočila, da revizijo umika.

Glede na omenjeno izjavo tožene stranke je bilo treba umik revizije vzeti na znanje.

Izrek o stroških revizijskega postopka je odpadel, ker jih tožeča stranka v odgovoru na revizijo ni zaznamovala.