Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Sklep II Ips 570/92 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1993:II.IPS.570.92 AI generated

Court allows withdrawal of appeal before final ruling, dismissing costs due to no response.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 570/92
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court permitted the appellant to withdraw their appeal before the appellate court issued a decision. Although the first-instance judgment was dismissed and the second-instance appeal rejected as unfounded, the appellant timely submitted a withdrawal statement prior to the appellate court's ruling. Consequently, the withdrawal was accepted, and no decision on appeal costs was required because the appellate process concluded without a substantive ruling on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 399 of the Civil Procedure Act; A party may withdraw an appeal at any time before the appellate court issues a decision, rendering the withdrawal effective and obviating the need for a ruling on appeal costs.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal appellate procedure civil procedure act costs of appeal timing of withdrawal appellate court decision procedural dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 399 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 349/2 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 9 of Law No. 2515
Article 10 of Law No. 2515
Article 4.1 of the Constitutional Act on the Independence of the Judiciary

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Umik revizije se vzame na znanje.

[JEDRO]

Revident lahko revizijo umakne, dokler revizijsko sodišče o njej ne odloči.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je z obravnavano sodbo zavrnilo tožničin tožbeni zahtevek. Sodišče druge stopnje je z izpodbijano sodbo zavrnilo tožničino pritožbo kot neutemeljeno in potrdilo sodbo prve stopnje. Tožnica je zoper to pravnomočno sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vložila pravočasno in dovoljeno revizijo, ki je bila predložena revizijskemu sodišču zaradi odločitve. Še preden je revizijsko sodišče o reviziji odločilo, pa je tožnica z izjavo z dne 2.12.1992 sporočila, da revizijo umika.

Po določbi 399. člena ZPP (Zakona o pravdnem postopku, Ur.l. SFRJ 4/77-27/90 v zvezi z 9. in 10. členom zakona št. 2515, Ur.l. RS 55/92 in členom 4.1 Ustavnega zakona za izvedbo temeljne ustavne listine o samostojnosti in neodvisnosti Republike Slovenije, Ur.l. RS 1/91-I) v zvezi s členom 349/2 ZPP lahko stranka umakne že vloženo revizijo, vse dokler revizijsko sodišče o njej ne izda odločbe. Zatorej je bilo treba umik revizije vzeti na znanje. O stroških revizijskega postopka ni bilo treba odločati, ker odgovora na revizijo ni bilo.