Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep R 60/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1999:R.60.99 AI generated

Court rules first instance jurisdiction lies with District Court for economic lease disputes between companies and sole proprietors.

Case Number VSL sklep R 60/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia ruled that the District Court in Ljubljana has substantive jurisdiction over this economic lease dispute. The lower court initially declared itself incompetent, but the Supreme Court found the parties to be a company and sole proprietors, meeting the criteria for an economic dispute under Article 481 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the Supreme Court affirmed the District Court's authority to hear the case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 481 of the Code of Civil Procedure; If the parties to a lease dispute are a company and sole proprietors, the District Court has substantive jurisdiction as the matter constitutes an economic dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
substantive jurisdiction economic dispute lease agreement sole proprietor Code of Civil Procedure District Court competence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 481 of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPP/99)
Article 2 of the first paragraph of Article 481 of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPP/99)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, Judgment of 17 November 1999, Case No. III R 32/99
AI generated
VSL Sklep R 172/2019
Court dismisses jurisdiction dispute as joint marital property shares must be determined uniformly across all assets.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 273/2021
Appeal partially allowed; court rejects land registry formalities for unregistered building parts in co-ownership agreement.
VSRS Sklep I Up 132/2018
Appeal dismissed; civil damages claim against state not an administrative dispute under ZUS-1.
VSL sklep I Cp 2527/2015
Appeal granted; Supreme Court rules jurisdiction lies with district court for property registration disputes under ZIZ s. 168(5).
VSL sklep I Cp 751/2011
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to state claim value required for jurisdiction in cohabitation dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Stvarno pristojno za odločanje (v tem gospodarskem sporu) je Okrožno sodišče v Ljubljani.

[JEDRO]

Če so izpolnjena merila iz prvega odst. 481. čl. ZPP/99, ki spor iz najemnega razmerja opredeljujejo kot gospodarski spor, je stvarno pristojno sodišče za sojenje v sporu okrožno sodišče.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Okrajno sodišče v Ljubljani se je s sklepom z dne 16.8.1999, opr. št.

IV P 176/99-7, izreklo za stvarno nepristojno, nakar je zadevo (po pravnomočnosti sklepa) odstopilo Okrožnemu sodišču v Ljubljani, ki pa je sprožilo spor o pristojnosti.

Sodišče druge stopnje je v tem sporu odločilo, da je za odločanje stvarno pristojno Okrožno sodišče v Ljubljani.

V obravnavani zadevi gre za gospodarski spor, saj je tožnik gospodarska družba, toženca pa sta samostojna podjetnika. Ker so torej izpolnjena merila iz (2. točke) prvega odst. 481. čl. Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP/99), ki spor iz najemnega razmerja (najemne pogodbe z dne 9.3.1990 z aneksoma z dne 30.10.1992 in z dne 23.4.1993) opredeljujejo kot gospodarski spor, je stvarno pristojno sodišče za sojenje v sporu Okrožno sodišče v Ljubljani.

To izhaja tako iz sklepa Vrhovnega sodišča Republike Slovenije z dne 17.11.1999, opr. št. III R 32/99, kot tudi iz pravnega mnenja, ki je bilo sprejeto na jesenski evidenčni občni seji Vrhovnega sodišča Republike Slovenije dne 9.12.1999.