Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 233/94 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1995:CPG.233.94 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; debt collector's appeal against enforcement order rejected due to lack of valid grounds under enforcement law.

Case Number VSM sklep Cpg 233/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appeal court dismissed the debtor's appeal, upholding the first-instance court's decision to allow enforcement proceedings. The debtor had objected to the enforcement, claiming the creditor failed to submit proper documentary evidence, but the court found this argument invalid for a standard enforcement based on a final judgment. The court ruled that such an objection is only successful if it relies on specific statutory grounds under the Enforcement Act, which the debtor failed to establish.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o izvršilnem postopku 50. člen; 51. člen: In standard enforcement proceedings based on a final court decision, an objection by the debtor is admissible only if it is based on one of the specific grounds enumerated in the relevant articles of the Enforcement Act, and a mere claim of missing documentation without such legal basis does not suspend or invalidate the enforcement.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement proceedings standard enforcement objection grounds final court decision enforcement act article 50 documentary enforcement appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
50. člen Zakona o izvršilnem postopku
AI generated
VSL sklep II Cpg 1200/99
Appeal against enforcement objection dismissed; debtor failed to prove partial payment as required by law.
Sklep II Ips 70/2011
Supreme Court allows enforcement objection for interest claims exceeding statute of limitations after judgment enforceability.
VSL sklep II Cpg 325/2000
Enforcement of debt transfer via private contract without notarization is inadmissible under enforcement law.
VSL sklep II Cpg 934/99
Appeal dismissed; enforcement order stands despite alleged procedural errors until title is revoked.
VSL sklep II Cpg 436/2000
Appeal dismissed; debtor failed to substantiate debt discharge in enforcement objection under ZIZ. Debt already adjudicated and withdrawn in prior litigation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne kot neutemeljena in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

Dolžnika bremenijo njegovi pritožbeni stroški.

[JEDRO]

Zoper sklep sodišče I. stopnje, ki je dovolilo izvršbo, je dolžnik pravočasno ugovarjal, češ da upnik ni predložil ustrezne dokumentacije - verodostojnih listin (neobrazložen ugovor). Pri redni izvršbi je lahko ugovor uspešen le, če uveljavlja katerega izmed razlogov iz 50. člena zakona o izvršilnem postopku.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Upnik je vložil izvršilni predlog na podlagi pravnomočne sodbe Temeljnega sodišča v Mariboru, Enote v Slovenj Gradcu opr. št. Pg 188/93 z dne 19.8.1993. Zoper sklep sodišče I. stopnje, ki je dovolilo izvršbo, je dolžnik pravočasno ugovarjal, češ da upnik ni predložil ustrezne dokumentacije - verodostojnih listin. Zoper sklep sodišče I. stopnje, ki je ugovor zavrnilo, je dolžnik v pravočasni pritožbi ponovil svoje navedbe iz ugovora in še dodal, "da ima že sam ugovor moč razveljavitve".

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Pritožnik je očitno spregledal, da gre v tem primeru za redno izvršbo na podlagi pravnomočne sodne odločbe. Njegova pravna izvajanja o učinkih neobrazloženega ugovora se nanašajo na takozvano dokumentarno izvršbo. Pri redni izvršbi pa je lahko ugovor uspešen le, če uveljavlja katerega izmed razlogov iz 50. člena zakona o izvršilnem postopku. Takega ugovora pa dolžnik ni vložil, kot je to pravilno ugotovilo sodišče prve stopnje v izpodbijanem sklepu.

Ker dolžnik s svojo pritožbo ni uspel, trpi pritožbene stroške.