Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep III Cp 351/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:III.CP.351.2000 AI generated

Court allows withdrawal of appeal before second instance judgment is issued under ZPP and ZIZ.

Case Number VSL sklep III Cp 351/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court ruled that the defendant's objection was withdrawn, allowing the enforcement proceedings to continue. The defendant had filed an objection against the first-instance court's decision to permit enforcement of alimony payments but subsequently submitted a withdrawal application before the second-instance court issued its ruling. The court decided in favor of the withdrawal because the law permits parties to retract appeals or objections at any time prior to the issuance of the second-instance judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZPP 334. odst. 2; ZIZ 58. odst. 3: A party may withdraw an appeal or objection at any time before the second-instance court issues its decision, thereby terminating the procedural challenge.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal enforcement proceedings alimony enforcement second instance procedure ZPP article 334 ZIZ article 58 procedural withdrawal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju (ZIZ) 58. odst. 3
Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) 334. odst. 2
AI generated
VSL sklep III Cp 791/2000
Appeal court remands execution objection case to first instance for oral hearing on disputed alimony payments.
VSL sklep III Cp 316/2000
Court dismisses appeal in enforcement proceedings, ruling debtor bears burden of proof for alimony payments.
VSL sklep III Cp 438/2000
Alimony enforcement partially allowed; interest claims rejected; statute of limitations does not run during parental rights.
VSM sklep I Ip 26/2012
Court dismisses appeal on legal interest from enforcement costs, ruling they run only after voluntary payment deadline expires.
VSL sklep III Cp 1681/99
Execution objection regarding child support eligibility treated as appeal due to lack of statutory grounds.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je ugovor umaknjen.

[JEDRO]

Dolžnica lahko umakne že vloženo pravno sredstvo do izdaje odločbe sodišča, ki je pristojno za odločanje o tem pravnem sredstvu.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Prvostopno sodišče je po predlogu upnikov na podlagi izvršilnega naslova (A1-A27) dovolilo zoper dolžnico izvršbo zaradi izterjave plačila mesečno neplačane preživnine v skupnem znesku 27.000,00 SIT od 1.2.1992 do 1.11.1992 in v skupnem znesku 371.708,80 SIT od 15.11.1992 do 15.9.1999; zaradi izterjave stroškov v znesku 19.228,00 SIT in zavarovanja plačevanja mesečne preživnine od 15.9.1999 do 15.8.2000 v znesku 6.820,60, ki se revalorizira v skladu z obvestili Centra za socialno delo. Proti sklepu je ugovarjala dolžnica in predlaga razveljavitev sklepa o dovolitvi izvršbe.

Prvostopno sodišče je dne 29.2.2000 po določbi tretjega odstavka 58. člena Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju (ZIZ) ugovor odstopilo pritožbenemu sodišču, da o njem odloči kot o pritožbi.

Po določbi drugega odstavka 334.člena Zakona o pravdnem o postopku - ZPP (Ur.l. RS, št. 26/99) v zvezi s 15.členom ZIZ lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pritožbo (konkretno: ugovor), dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe. Z vlogo z dne 9.3.2000 je dolžnica sporočila prvemu sodišču, da umika ugovor. Prvo sodišče je umik ugovora poslalo pritožbenemu sodišču dne 10.3.2000. Zato je bilo treba skladno s citirano določbo ugotoviti, da je dolžnica umaknila ugovor pred izdajo odločbe sodišča druge stopnje.