Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep III Cp 1577/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1999:III.CP.1577.99 AI generated

Court allows appeal against enforcement request dismissal due to proven court fee payment.

Case Number VSL sklep III Cp 1577/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court granted the creditor's appeal and revoked the first-instance court's decision dismissing the enforcement request. The lower court had deemed the request withdrawn because the creditor failed to submit proof of paying the required court fee upon the court's request. However, the creditor provided bank statements proving the fee was paid on December 8, 1998, establishing the procedural prerequisite for enforcement. Consequently, the appellate court found no factual basis for the lower court's assumption of withdrawal and ordered the revocation of the dismissal decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

4. odst. 40. čl. ZIZ; 3. točka 380. čl. ZPP: Payment of court fees for enforcement requests is a procedural prerequisite; failure to produce proof does not justify assuming withdrawal if evidence of payment exists.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement request court fee payment procedural prerequisite withdrawal presumption appellate review ZIZ provision ZPP revocation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
4. odst. 40. čl. ZIZ
Plačilo sodne takse za predlog in sklep za izvršbo ob vložitvi predloga je procesna predpostavka (4. odst. 40. čl. ZIZ).
3. točka 380. čl. ZPP
Izpodbijani sklep je bilo zato potrebno razveljaviti (3. točka 380. čl. ZPP).
AI generated
VSK sklep Cpg 398/99
Appeal dismissed because creditor withdrew enforcement request, losing legal interest to challenge the withdrawal order.
VSL sklep II Cp 1267/2013
Appeal granted; direct service to client with counsel violates ZPP and requires case remand.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 548/2021
Appeal dismissed because court fee paid late via third party failed to meet strict three-day receipt rule.
VSL Sklep II Cpg 790/2018
Appeal dismissed; appeal deemed withdrawn due to non-payment of court fee after valid service of notice.
VSL sklep II Cp 693/2013
Partial payment of court fee deemed unpaid; court's discretion on proportionality irrelevant.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožbi upnika se ugodi in se izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje razveljavi.

[JEDRO]

Plačilo sodne takse za predlog in sklep o izvršbi je procesna predpostavka. Ker je iz pritožbi priloženega dokazila razvidno, da je upnik takso plačal, ni podlage za domnevo o umiku predloga za izvršbo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve vrste odločilo, da se šteje predlog za izvršbo za umaknjen, ker da ga upnik na poziv sodišča ni dopolnil s predložitvijo potrdila o plačani sodni taksi.

Zoper takšen sklep se upnik pravočasno pritožuje in trdi, da je že 9.12.1998 sodišču poslal fotokopijo zbirnega izpisa prometa na tekočem računu, iz katerega je razvidno, da je takso plačal.

Pritožba je utemeljena.

Plačilo sodne takse za predlog in sklep za izvršbo ob vložitvi predloga je procesna predpostavka (4. odst. 40. čl. ZIZ). Iz listine, ki jo je predložil upnik, je razvidno, da je bila sodna taksa za konkretno zadevo plačana 8.12.1998, zato ni podana dejanska podlaga za izvršbo.

Izpodbijani sklep je bilo zato potrebno razveljaviti (3. točka 380. čl. ZPP).