Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Kp 157/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:I.KP.157.2000 AI generated

Higher court dismisses prosecutor's appeal as inadmissible when the appeal is withdrawn by the lower prosecutor.

Case Number VSL sklep I Kp 157/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Higher Court in Ljubljana dismissed the State Prosecutor's appeal against a first-instance acquittal, ruling it inadmissible. The District Prosecutor had initially appealed due to alleged factual errors, but the Higher Prosecutor subsequently withdrew the appeal on January 13, 2000. The court held that under Article 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an appeal withdrawn by the prosecutor must be rejected as inadmissible, rendering the procedural remedy void.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act; if the prosecutor withdraws an appeal, the higher court must reject it as inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal withdrawal inadmissible appeal prosecutor withdrawal higher court procedure Criminal Procedure Act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act
AI generated
Sodba Kp 7/2004
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against conditional sentence due to recidivism and lack of probation conditions.
Sodba I Ips 269/2001
Supreme Court rejects appeal on confession evidence status, ruling it remains admissible even if sole proof.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1221/2012
Appeal dismissed; debtor's signing of assignment agreement does not alter their legal position compared to being notified of assignment.
VSL Sodba II Cp 2673/2017
Cable retransmission claim dismissed; tariff rule cannot determine compensation for cable retransmission of musical works.
VSK sklep Cpg 135/2014
Appeal dismissed; creditor failed to prove asset concealment required for freezing order under ZIZ Art. 257.1.2.1.1.1.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba državnega tožilca se zavrže kot nedovoljena.

[JEDRO]

Če višji državni tožilec umakne pritožbo okrožnega državnega tožilca je višje sodišče dolžno takšno pritožbo zavreči kot nedovoljeno.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Okrajno sodišče v Ljubljani je z izpodbijano sodbo obdolženko iz razloga po 3. točki 358. člena ZKP oprostilo obtožbe kaznivega dejanja zatajitve po 1. odstavku 215. člena KZ in odločilo, da "stroški kazenskega postopka bremenijo na podlagi 1. odstavka 96. člena ZKP proračun".

Proti navedeni sodbi se je zaradi zmotne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja pritožil državni tožilec in predlagal, da naj višje sodišče izpodbijano sodbo razveljavi in zadevo vrne v novo sojenje.

Pritožba je nedovoljena.

Po določbi 390. člena ZKP višje sodišče pritožbo zavrže s sklepom kot nedovoljeno med drugim tudi v primeru, če je pritožba umaknjena.

Višja državna tožilka je dne 18.2.2000 podala izjavo, da pritožbo okrožnega državnega tožilca z dne 13.1.2000 umika. Zato je moralo višje sodišče skladno z navedeno določbo pritožbo zavreči kot nedovoljeno.