Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Cpg 798/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:I.CPG.798.99 AI generated

Appeal dismissed as filed after expiration of 15-day statutory appeal period.

Case Number VSL sklep I Cpg 798/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the appeal because it was filed after the expiration of the 15-day statutory period. The appellant received the first-instance judgment on February 3, 1998, and submitted the appeal on February 26, 1999, missing the deadline that ended on February 18, 1999. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible under the Code of Civil Procedure, requiring the rejection of the late submission.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku iz leta 1977, 2. odst. 358. čl.; 366. čl.: An appeal filed after the expiration of the statutory time limit is inadmissible and must be rejected by the appellate court.

Keywords

AI generated
statutory appeal period inadmissible appeal time limit expiration civil procedure code procedural defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odst. 358. čl. ZPP/77
Zato je prepozna (2. odst. 358. čl. ZPP/77).
366. čl. ZPP/77
Prepozno pritožbo pa mora pritožbeno sodišče zavreči (366. čl. ZPP/77).
AI generated
Sodba in sklep III Ips 107/2001
Revise partially allowed: oral work contracts suffice for non-structural repairs under ZOR Art. 600.
Sodba III Ips 90/2000
Contract formed by conduct; invoices as offer, payment as acceptance; appeal dismissed.
VSL sklep I Cp 1927/98
Appeal allowed; appeal court quashes first instance judgment and remands case for new trial on unpaid TV license fee.
VSL sklep I Cpg 222/2001
Appeal against order to return to previous state dismissed as review not permitted under ZPP/77.
VSL sklep I Cpg 1295/99
Appeal allowed; lease termination by agreement vs. notice; factual dispute requires new evidence.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Pritožba vložena po izteku 15 dnevnega roka je prepozna.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Pritožbeno sodišče je postopek nadaljevalo po določilih Zakona o pravdnem postopku iz leta 1977 (s spremembami; v nadaljevanju ZPP/77) na podlagi sedaj veljavnega 1. odst. 498. čl. Zakona o pravdnem postopku.

Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijano sodbo vzdržalo v veljavi sklep o izvršbi Okrajnega sodišča v Domžalah, opr. št. I Ig 351/96 z dne 15.5.1996 v 1. in 3. tč. izreka.

Proti sodbi sodišča prve stopnje je vložila pritožbo tožena stranka zaradi smiselno zatrjevane bistvene kršitve določb pravdnega postopka.

Pritožba je prepozna.

Iz potrdila o vročitvi izpodbijane sodbe toženi stranki sledi, da jo je ta prejela 3.2.1998 (povratnica speta k l.št. 17). Pritožbo pa je tožena stranka vložila priporočeno po pošti 26.2.1999. Ker je zadnji dan 15 - dnevnega pritožbenega roka potekel v četrtek, 18.2.1999, je pritožba vložena po preteku zakonskega roka. Zato je prepozna (2. odst. 358. čl. ZPP/77). Prepozno pritožbo pa mora pritožbeno sodišče zavreči (366. čl. ZPP/77).