Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 519/94 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1996:II.IPS.519.94 AI generated

Supreme Court allows withdrawal of appeal without consent under ZPP Art. 349(2) before ruling.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 519/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted the withdrawal of the appeal, concluding the review proceedings. The appellant had withdrawn the appeal on September 27, 1994, before the court issued a decision on it. The court ruled that no consent from the opposing party is required for such a withdrawal under the relevant procedural law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZPP 2. odst. 349.čl.; ZPP 399. čl.: A party may withdraw a legal remedy before the court rules on it without the consent of the opposing party.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal review proceedings ZPP Article 349 no consent required procedural law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
ZPP 2. odst. 349.čl.
ZPP 399. čl.
ZPP 2. odst. 158. čl.
AI generated
Sklep II DoR 72/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request as withdrawn due to failure to pay court fees within 15 days.
VSL sklep II Cp 2096/2012
Appeal granted; first buyer can seek land registry certificate if they proved possession and second buyer was in bad faith.
VSL sodba II Cp 99/2001
Court partially allows appeal, shifting litigation costs to plaintiffs due to failed ownership claims.
Sklep II DoR 81/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to failure to meet statutory pleading requirements under ZPP.
Sodba II Ips 377/2004
Supreme Court dismisses appeal rejecting claim for co-ownership based on unclear contract subject matter.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se umik revizije.

[JEDRO]

Po 2. odst. 349.čl. zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljnjem ZPP), ki se uporablja tudi v revizijskem postopku (399. čl. ZPP), lahko stranka umakne pravno sredstvo, dokler sodišče ne odloči o njem. Privolitev nasprotne stranke ni potrebna.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek na ugotovitev, da je pok. J. P. zapustila tožniku solastninske deleže na nepremičninah vl.št. 45, vl.št. 399, vl.št. 464 in vl.št. 390 k.o. L. in na izstavitev ustreznih zemljiškoknjižnih listin. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožeče stranke in potrdilo sodbo prve stopnje. Proti tej sodbi je vložila tožeča stranka dne 17.11.1993 revizijo in dne 18.11.1993 še dopolnitev revizije.

Tožeča stranka je z izjavo pred sodnikom dne 27.9.1994 umaknila to revizijo.

Po 2. odst. 349.čl. zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljnjem ZPP), ki se uporablja tudi v revizijskem postopku (399. čl. ZPP), lahko stranka umakne pravno sredstvo, dokler sodišče ne odloči o njem. Privolitev nasprotne stranke ni potrebna.

O tožnikovi reviziji revizijsko sodišče še ni odločalo. Zato je upoštevalo umik in to ugotovilo s sklepom.

S tem je revizijski postopek končan.

O stroških revizijskega postopka ni bilo treba odločati, ker tožena stranka odgovora na revizijo ni vložila (2. odst. 158. čl. ZPP).