Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSC sklep Kp 42/2001 ECLI:SI:VSCE:2001:KP.42.2001 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal and supplementary complaint as both filed after the statutory deadline expired.

Case Number VSC sklep Kp 42/2001
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court rejected the defendant's appeal and a subsequent supplementary complaint, ruling both submissions untimely. The defendant argued for the revocation of the first-instance decision based on a claim of procedural error, but the court found the appeal filed on January 4, 2001, and the supplementary complaint on January 12, 2001, were late. The court determined the deadline expired on December 29, 2000, because the defendant received the certified court record on December 20, 2000, with proper legal notification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o kazenskem postopku; Zakon o pritožbah: Če je nepopolna pritožba, v kateri je napovedana dopolnitev, ki je vložena po preteku roka za pritožbo, vložena prepozno, se obe pritožbi zavržeta kot prepozni.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal statutory deadline supplementary complaint procedural timeliness certified court record legal notification dismissal of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o kazenskem postopku
Zakon o pritožbah
AI generated
VSC Sklep I Cp 83/2024
Appeal dismissed; failure to file appeal in three copies after explicit warning leads to rejection under ZPP.
VSL sklep IV Cp 209/2010
Appeal dismissed because the appeal was filed three days after the 15-day deadline expired. The court rejected the claim based on the official service record. The appeal was not timely filed as it was sent by post after the deadline. The court upheld the first-instance decision regarding the time limit for filing the appeal.
VSL Sklep II Cp 2071/2019
Appeal dismissed; eight-day appeal period in small value civil cases is constitutionally justified.
VDS Sklep Psp 114/96
Appeal dismissed; first-instance court voided ruling for procedural error regarding service of judgment to wife.
VSL sklep I Cpg 96/99
Appeal dismissed: Service deemed effective on courier's receipt date, not client's later signature date, under ZPP. Appeal dismissed: Service deemed effective on courier's receipt date, not client's later signature date, under ZPP.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba obdolženega B. M. se z a v r n e kot neutemeljena.

[JEDRO]

Če je nepopolna pritožba, v kateri je napovedana dopolnitev, ki je vložena po preteku roka za pritožbo, vložena prepozno, se obe pritožbi zavržeta kot prepozni.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

: Sodišče prve stopnje je z navedenim sklepom zavrglo pritožbo obdolženega zoper sodbo z dne 7. 12. 2000, opr. št. K 27/2000-41, kot prepozno. Zoper ta sklep se je obdolženec pravočasno pritožil z laično pritožbo smiselno zaradi zmotne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja. Smiselno je predlagal razveljavitev izpodbijanega sklepa. Pritožba ni utemeljena. Prvostopenjsko sodišče je pravilno ugotovilo, da je pritožba zoper sodbo vložena prepozno. Iz priložene povratnice namreč resnično izhaja,da je obdolženec prejel overjen prepis sodbe 20. 12. 2000 z ustreznim pravnim poukom. Tako je rok za vložitev pritožbe v tem primeru iztekel dne 29. 12. 2000. Zato sta ugovor,ki ga je vložil obdolženec zoper sodbo dne 4. 1. 2001, in tudi pritožba z obrazložitvijo, ki jo je vložil dne 12. 1. 2001, prepozna. Zato sodišče druge stopnje pritožbi ni moglo ugoditi.