Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III Ips 69/2004 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2004:III.IPS.56.2004 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal in commercial case due to disputed subject value falling below 5 million SIT threshold. The court ruled the appeal inadmissible because the claim value was insufficient. The decision clarifies that commercial appeals require a high monetary threshold. The court applied the ZPP provisions to deny the appeal. The ruling emphasizes strict adherence to the value requirement. The outcome was a rejection of the appeal. The case involved a commercial dispute. The court found the appeal invalid. The decision stands on statutory grounds. The appeal was not allowed.

Case Number Sklep III Ips 69/2004
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the appeal against the lower court's decision to reject the defendant's protest. The defendant argued that the appeal was invalid due to insufficient information about court fees, while the plaintiff remained silent. The court ruled the appeal inadmissible because the disputed subject value of 142,113 SIT did not meet the 5 million SIT threshold required for commercial appeals under the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the lower court's decision to reject the protest was upheld based on the statutory value requirement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZPP 490. člen; ZPP 384. člen 2. odstavek: In commercial proceedings, an appeal is inadmissible if the value of the disputed subject matter does not exceed five million SIT, as the appeal's admissibility is strictly conditioned upon this monetary threshold.

Keywords

AI generated
commercial appeal admissibility disputed subject value threshold Code of Civil Procedure Slovenian Supreme Court protest rejection monetary value requirement civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
490. člen ZPP
39. člen ZPP 1. odstavek
384. člen ZPP 2. odstavek
377. člen ZPP
384. člen ZPP 4. odstavek
AI generated
VSL Sklep I Cp 2040/2020
Appeal granted; improper service of fee notice and miscalculated deadline violated due process rights.
VSL sklep I Cpg 538/2015
Public agency appeal dismissed; not exempt from court fees under ZST-1 as distinct from state organs.
VSL sklep I Cp 4139/2009
Appeal dismissed because first instance court failed to warn appellant of withdrawal consequences for non-payment of court fees.
VSL Sklep I Cp 1151/2020
Appeal dismissed because the appellant failed to pay the court fee, a mandatory prerequisite for filing an appeal.
VSL sklep II Cpg 31/2019
Appeal court voids court fee order for withdrawn appeal notice when no fee was paid initially.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

V gospodarskem sporu je za dovoljenost revizije z določbo 490. člena ZPP predpisano, da mora vrednost spornega predmeta znašati več kot 5,000.000,00 SIT.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je štelo napoved pritožbe tožene stranke z dne 11.12.2003 zoper sodbo Okrožnega sodišča opr. št. I Pg 78/2001 z dne 28.10.2003 za umaknjeno, ker tožena stranka ni plačala celotne predpisane sodne takse v 15 dneh od vročitve sklepa, s katerim je bila pozvana k plačilu sodne takse. Pritožbeno sodišče je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in izpodbijani sklep potrdilo.

Tožena stranka je v vlogi, naslovljeni "Zahteva po reviziji v zadevi I Pg 78/2001 - K. d.o.o.", zahtevala revizijo postopka. Uveljavlja, da ji je bila odvzeta možnost pritožbe zaradi pomanjkljive informacije o višini takse.

Revizija je bila vročena tožeči stranki, ki nanjo ni odgovorila.

Revizija ni dovoljena.

V gospodarskem sporu je za dovoljenost revizije z določbo 490. člena ZPP predpisano, da mora vrednost spornega predmeta znašati več kot 5,000.000,00 SIT. Pri določitvi vrednosti spornega predmeta se upošteva vrednost glavnega zahtevka (1. odstavek 39. člena ZPP). V tej zadevi vrednost glavnega zahtevka znaša 142.113,00 SIT. Ker ne presega 5,000.000,00 SIT, revizija po določbi 490. člena in 2.

odstavka 384. člena ZPP (ker se izpodbija sklep) ni dovoljena in jo je zato revizijsko sodišče na podlagi določbe 377. člena in 4.

odstavka 384. člena ZPP zavrglo.