Court dismisses appeal due to voluntary withdrawal before final judgment by the appellate court.
Slovenia (SI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court determined that the appellant withdrew their appeal before the appellate court issued a final decision. Although the appellant initially challenged the lower court's ruling regarding the company's shareholders' meeting, they subsequently filed a motion to withdraw the appeal on September 17, 2003. The court ruled that this withdrawal was permissible under the relevant procedural code, thereby preventing the appellate court from making a decision on the merits of the case.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArticle 334 paragraph 2 in conjunction with Article 383 of the Code of Civil Procedure; withdrawal of an appeal is permissible if the appellate court has not yet rendered a decision, resulting in the court declining to adjudicate the appeal.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Ugotovi se, da je tožeča stranka revizijo umaknila.
[JEDRO]
Ker revizijsko sodišče še ni izdalo odločbe, je umik revizije dopusten. Zaradi dopustnega umika revizijsko sodišče o reviziji ne bo odločalo.
[OBRAZLOŽITEV]
Tožeča stranka je s tožbo zahtevala ugotovitev ničnosti sklepov skupščine tožene stranke.
Prvostopenjsko sodišče je tožbeni zahtevek zavrnilo.
Drugostopenjsko sodišče je potrdilo prvostopenjsko sodbo.
Sodbo je tožeča stranka najprej izpodbijala z revizijo, potem pa je z vlogo z dne 17.9.2003 revizijo umaknila. Ker revizijsko sodišče še ni izdalo odločbe, je umik revizije po drugem odstavku 334. člena v zvezi s 383. členom ZPP dopusten. Zaradi dopustnega umika revizijsko sodišče o reviziji ne bo odločalo.