Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 47/97 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1997:I.R.47.97 AI generated

Supreme Court transfers case to another district court due to significant weighty reasons involving the defendant being a judge.

Case Number Sklep I R 47/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia designated the District Court in Y to decide the case, delegating authority from the District Court in X. The original court proposed this transfer because the defendant was the presiding judge of the court where the lawsuit was filed. The court ruled that the transfer was justified by weighty reasons under Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act, ensuring a fairer process.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act; The Supreme Court may designate another court of substantive jurisdiction when weighty reasons exist, such as when the defendant is a judge of the original court.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Act substantive jurisdiction weighty reasons judge as defendant court designation procedural fairness delegation of authority

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
Sklep I Pr 28/94
Supreme Court allows transfer of case due to judge's spouse being the opposing party and personal acquaintances.
Sklep I R 66/2009
Supreme Court dismisses transfer of jurisdiction request based on plaintiff's subjective feelings of unfairness.
Sklep I R 26/97
Court transfers possession dispute to another court due to conflict of interest involving a court employee.
VDSS sklep Pdp 458/2015
Appeal dismissed; labor court lacks jurisdiction over tort claims against employee co-defendant.
VSL sklep II Cp 2225/2004
Court dismisses claim for reimbursement of state-paid technical inspection costs as a traffic violation expense, not a civil dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej zadevi se določi Okrajno sodišče v Y.

[JEDRO]

Določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča zaradi tehtnih razlogov (tožena stranka je sodnica sodišča).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Tožnik je pri Okrajnem sodišču v kraju X proti toženki, ki je predstojnica tega sodišča, vložil tožbo "zaradi povrnitve stroškov v dveh pravdah.

Okrajno sodišče v X je dne 9.10.1997 po predstojnici, ki je v tem primeru tudi tožena stranka, predlagalo določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča v skladu z določbo 68. člena ZPP.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po 68. členu ZPP lahko Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije na predlog stranke ali pristojnega sodišča odloči, naj postopa v posamezni zadevi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi. Obstoj slednjega, torej tehtnih razlogov, ki pogojujejo delegacijo pristojnosti, je iz vloge Okrajnega sodišča v X razviden in objektivno izkazan. Za odločanje v tej stvari je bilo zato delegirano Okrajno sodišče v Y.