Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 29/95 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1995:I.R.29.95 AI generated

Supreme Court delegates case to Radovljica District Court for procedural efficiency under ZPP Art. 68.

Case Number Sklep I R 29/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia delegated jurisdiction from the District Court in Kranj to the District Court in Radovljica. The plaintiff, an employee of the Kranj court, argued that delegation was necessary due to the plaintiff's employment status and the Kranj court's inability to proceed. The court ruled that delegation under Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act is justified when another competent court can handle the case more easily, which was confirmed by the Radovljica court's existing involvement in a related matter.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 6.106 of the Courts Act: The Supreme Court may delegate a case to another competent court if it is evident that the procedure will be conducted more easily or if other significant reasons exist.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial delegation civil procedure law procedural efficiency competent court territorial jurisdiction Supreme Court powers ZPP Article 68

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 6.106 of the Courts Act
AI generated
Sklep I R 110/2006
Supreme Court allows transfer of case to another court due to employee's employment there affecting public perception of neutrality.
Sklep I R 27/2001
Supreme Court transfers case to another court because a defendant works at the current court.
Sklep I Pr 48/92
Court dismisses case against a judge due to conflict of interest and lack of impartiality.
Sklep I R 66/2002
Supreme Court transfers case to Celje Court due to employee's employment at Žalec Court raising impartiality doubts.
Sklep I R 25/2009
Supreme Court transfers case to another district court due to judge's father being the defendant.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej zadevi se določi kot pristojno sodišče Okrajno sodišče v Radovljici.

[JEDRO]

Temelj delegacije po 68. členu ZPP je smotrnost izvedbe postopka, ki se kaže v tem, da bo drugo sicer stvarno pristojno sodišče lažje opravilo postopek.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Po prejemu tožbe v navedeni pravdni zadevi je Okrajno sodišče v Kranju, ki bi bilo stvarno in krajevno pristojno za razrešitev spora, predlagalo Vrhovnemu sodišču Republike Slovenije, da delegira za razrešitev spora drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče. Meni, da so podani tehtni razlogi za delegacijo po 68. členu zakona o pravdnem postopku, med drugim zato, ker je tožeča stranka delavec Okrajnega sodišča v Kranju.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po določilu 68. člena zakona o pravdnem postopku (naprej ZPP) najvišje sodišče v državi, na predlog stranke ali pristojnega sodišča določi, da naj postopa v posamezni zadevi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče z njegovega območja, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek ali če so zato drugi tehtni razlogi. Temelj take delegacije je smotrnost, ki se kaže v tem, da bo drugo sicer stvarno pristojno sodišče laže opravilo postopek. Iz podatkov spisa izhaja, da Okrajno sodišče v Radovljici že obravnava določeno zadevo, v kateri nastopata pravdni stranki kot udeleženca postopka, iz samega predloga pa je dalje razvidno, da Okrajno sodišče v Kranju v zadevi ne bi moglo postopati. Vrhovno sodišče je zato na podlagi spredaj navedenega določila in 6. točke 106. člena zakona o sodiščih določilo za krajevno pristojno stvarno pristojno Okrajno sodišče v Radovljici.