Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep VIII Ips 122/2007 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2007:VIII.IPS.122.2007 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal withdrawal request as appeal remains pending before the court's decision.

Case Number Sklep VIII Ips 122/2007
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. The appellant had filed an appeal against a final judgment but subsequently submitted a written notice of withdrawal. The court ruled that under the Code of Civil Procedure, a party may withdraw an appeal only until the court issues a decision on it. Since the court had not yet decided on the appeal, the withdrawal was invalid.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. odstavek 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku; 383. člen ZPP: A party may withdraw an appeal only until the court issues a decision on it, rendering a post-decision withdrawal ineffective.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal withdrawal Code of Civil Procedure supreme court jurisdiction procedural timeline validity of withdrawal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odstavek 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
383. člen ZPP
AI generated
Sodba VIII Ips 274/2006
Employment termination dismissed: unauthorized leave constitutes breach but not sufficient to end contract.
Sodba VIII Ips 77/2008
Employment contract termination rejected; new contract prevents old one from reviving due to non-existence of business grounds.
Sodba VIII Ips 353/2006
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on termination due to reorganization, ruling courts don't assess business restructuring validity.
Sodba VIII Ips 214/2006
Appeal dismissed; employer failed to serve termination reasons within 15 days, invalidating summary dismissal despite misconduct.
Sklep VIII Ips 115/2009
Supreme Court allows labor law appeal, ruling termination grounds valid upon decision date, not regulation enactment. Verdict: partially_allowed

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se umik revizije.

[JEDRO]

Stranka lahko umakne vloženo revizijo, dokler sodišče o njej ne odloči.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku, ugotovilo nezakonitost odpovedi tožnikove pogodbe o zaposlitvi, ki jo je tožena stranka podala dne 26.10.2004 in toženi stranki naložilo, da pozove tožnika nazaj na delo in mu prizna neprekinjene pravice iz delovnega razmerja.

Zoper pravnomočno sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožena stranka dne 8.1.2007 vložila revizijo, dne 30.3.2007 pa je posredovala sodišču pismeno obvestilo, da revizijo umika.

Na podlagi 2. odstavka 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP - prečiščeno besedilo, Ur. l. RS, št. 36/04) lahko stranka umakne vloženo pritožbo, dokler sodišče o njej ne izda odločbe. Na podlagi 383. člena ZPP velja smiselno to tudi za revizijo.

Ker sodišče o vloženi reviziji tožene stranke še ni odločilo, je moralo upoštevati izjavo tožene stranke o njenem umiku.