Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep VIII Ips 268/2005 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2006:VIII.IPS.268.2005 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses late appeal as procedurally time-barred under Labor Law provisions.

Case Number Sklep VIII Ips 268/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's appeal, ruling it was filed too late. The applicant had received the contested decision in August 2002 but submitted the appeal in 2005, well beyond the statutory deadline. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal as procedurally inadmissible without examining the merits of the underlying labor dispute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o postopku pri delovnih in socialnih sporih; appeal must be filed within thirty days of service; late appeals are dismissed as inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
labor dispute appeal procedural time limit service of decision inadmissible appeal labor law procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367, paragraph 1 of the Act on Procedure in Labor and Social Disputes
Article 375 of the Act on Procedure in Labor and Social Disputes
Article 377 of the Act on Procedure in Labor and Social Disputes

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Case No. Pdp 1941/2003-2, 5 May 2005
AI generated
VDS sklep Pdp 1704/2004
Appeal court dismisses temporary injunction request for business termination dismissal as lawful.
VDS sklep Pdp 1855/2003
Appeal dismissed; interim stay of termination rejected as contract already ended by dismissal.
VDS sodba in sklep Pdp 1661/2001
Appeal partially allowed; employer reclassifies employee as surplus worker after objective business changes eliminate need for specific role.
Sodba VIII Ips 250/2004
Appeal dismissed; employee must follow final work assignment unless life/health danger exists without safety measures.
Sodba VIII Ips 63/99
Appeal dismissed; court upheld dismissal of insurance agent due to absence exceeding five days without required presence.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Prepozno revizijo sodišče zavrže.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je z obravnavanim sklepom zavrnilo tožnikov predlog za izdajo začasne odredbe, da se zadrži učinkovanje odločbe tožene stranke o razporeditvi dokler traja spor o nezakonitosti odločbe o prenehanju delovnega razmerja.

Drugostopenjsko sodišče je z izpodbijanim sklepom zavrnilo pritožbo tožnika in potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

Zoper pravnomočni sklep, izdan na drugi stopnji, je vložil tožnik revizijo z isto vlogo, s katero je vložil revizijo zoper pravnomočno sodbo Višjega delovnega in socialnega sodišča opr. št. Pdp 1941/2003-2 z dne 5. 5. 2005.

Revizija je bila v skladu z določbo 375. člena ZPP vročena toženi stranki, ki na revizijo ni odgovorila, in Vrhovnemu državnemu tožilstvu Republike Slovenije.

Revizija je prepozna.

Ne da bi se posebej spuščalo v vprašanje, ali je revizija sploh dovoljena, revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da je vložena očitno prepozno. Izpodbijani sklep je tožnik osebno prejel avgusta leta 2002 (pooblaščenca takrat ni imel), zato je revizija, vložena leta 2005, vložena daleč po trideset dnevnem roku iz prvega odstavka 367. člena ZPP. Zato jo je Vrhovno sodišče v skladu z določbo 377. člena ZPP kot prepozno zavrglo.