Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep Ips 229/2003 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2003:IPS.229.2003 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal and orders appellant to bear their own appeal costs.

Case Number Sklep Ips 229/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia ruled to find the withdrawal of the appeal. The appellant had filed an appeal against a final second-instance judgment citing procedural violations and misapplication of law, but subsequently withdrew it on October 1, 2003. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal and determined that the appellant must bear their own appeal costs under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

383. člen v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 334. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku; 152. člen ZPP: If a party withdraws an appeal after filing it, the court shall find the withdrawal and the withdrawing party bears the costs.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal costs of appeal Code of Civil Procedure final judgment supreme court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
383. člen v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 334. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku
152. člen ZPP
AI generated
Sodba II Ips 248/96
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, upholding reduced damages for fear and mental pain under ZOR.
Sodba VIII Ips 301/2009
Partial dismissal of severance pay claim; partial invalid pension not counted as salary base.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 617/2023
Appeal dismissed; military border guard work excluded from EU Working Time Directive due to continuous duty nature.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 243/2025
Employment court partially allows appeal, reducing severance pay from 7 to 4 average monthly salaries based on employee's job prospects.
VSRS Sklep Dsp 8/2020
Appeal dismissed; appeal against appellate court's remittal is inadmissible under ZPP s. 357a.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se umik revizije. Tožeča stranka krije sama svoje revizijske stroške.

[JEDRO]

Tožeča stranka je zoper pravnomočno sodbo, izdano na drugi stopnji, vložila revizijo zaradi bistvene kršitve določb pravdnega postopka in zaradi zmotne uporabe materialnega prava. To revizijo je kasneje z vlogo umaknila, zato je sodišče sklenilo, kot izhaja iz izreka tega sklepa.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo razlike nadomestila plače za čas bolniškega staleža. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožeče stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

Zoper pravnomočno sodbo, izdano na drugi stopnji, je tožeča stranka 16. 6. 2003 vložila revizijo zaradi bistvene kršitve določb pravdnega postopka in zaradi zmotne uporabe materialnega prava, ki pa jo je z vlogo z dne 1. 10. 2003 umaknila.

Vrhovno sodišče je zato na podlagi 383. člena v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 334. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku (Uradni list RS, št. 26/99 in 96/2002 - ZPP) sklenilo, kot izhaja iz izreka tega sklepa. Glede priglašenih revizijskih stroškov je na podlagi določb 152.

člena ZPP odločilo, da jih tožeča stranka, ki je revizijo umaknila, trpi sama.