Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep VIII Ips 92/2003 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2003:VIII.IPS.92.2003 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal case, ruling court only notes withdrawal if filed. Withdrawal of appeal by party prevents further review. Court confirms lower court decision remains valid. Withdrawal is procedural, not substantive review. Court notes withdrawal prevents further review. Withdrawal is procedural, not substantive review.

Case Number Sklep VIII Ips 92/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia ruled that when a party withdraws an appeal, the appellate court merely notes the withdrawal and does not conduct a substantive review. The lower court had revoked a decision regarding the allocation of a plaintiff due to unmet urgent needs, and the second instance court rejected the defendant's protest. The defendant subsequently filed an appeal but withdrew it before the Supreme Court could examine the merits, resulting in the court's decision to simply record the withdrawal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), 383. člen v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 334. člena: Če stranka umakne vloženo revizijo, revizijsko sodišče le ugotovi njen umik in ne preverja vsebine pritožbe.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal supreme court procedure procedural dismissal appeal withdrawal effect ZPP article 383

Cited Legislation

AI generated
383. člen v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 334. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
AI generated
VDS sodba Pdp 1015/2005
Appeal dismissed; employer lacked legal basis to reassign employee due to expired prior employer's re-hire obligation.
VDS sodba Pdp 800/2002
Appeal dismissed; pre-assignment medical exam not required for lawful job transfer if worker is later deemed fit.
Sodba VIII Ips 27/97
Appeal dismissed; disciplinary dismissal void due to failure to follow collective agreement hearing procedures.
Sodba VIII Ips 29/98
Supreme Court dismisses appeal claiming employer failed to use additional criteria for redundant worker selection.
VDS sklep Pdp 1167/2002
Appeal court dismisses request for interim order to assign specific job due to employer's exclusive authority.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se umik revizije.

[JEDRO]

Če stranka vloženo revizijo umakne, revizijsko sodišče le ugotovi njen umik.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je razveljavilo sklepe tožene stranke o razporeditvi tožnice. Sodišče je ugotovilo, da za razporeditev niso bili izpolnjeni pogoji nujnih potreb delovnega procesa in organizacije dela.

Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo kot neutemeljeno in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

Zoper pravnomočno sodbo, izdano na drugi stopnji, je tožena stranka 10.3.2003 zaradi vseh revizijskih razlogov vložila revizijo, ki pa jo je z vlogo z dne 14.7.2003 umaknila.

Vrhovno sodišče je zato na podlagi 383. člena v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 334. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku (Uradni list RS, št. 26/99 in 96/2002 - ZPP) sklenilo, kot izhaja iz izreka tega sklepa.