Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 393/95 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1995:II.IPS.393.95 AI generated

Supreme Court confirms withdrawal of appeal before decision, ruling procedural withdrawal valid under law.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 393/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia confirmed the withdrawal of an appeal filed by a party against an interim decision regarding property denationalization. The appellant had initially argued for fundamental procedural violations and application of substantive law but subsequently notified the court of their withdrawal before a ruling was issued. The court ruled that since the withdrawal occurred prior to any decision on the appeal, the court was obligated to formally ascertain the withdrawal and dismiss the appeal accordingly.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

399. člen v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 349. člena zakona o pravdnem postopku; When a party withdraws an appeal before the court issues a decision on it, the court must ascertain the withdrawal and dismiss the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal procedural law interim decision denationalization property rights supreme court appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
399. člen v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 349. člena zakona o pravdnem postopku
37. člen zakona o nepravdnem postopku
AI generated
Sodba X Ips 1038/2005
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when administrative procedure is legally terminated by claimant's withdrawal.
VSL sklep II Cp 395/94
Denationalization claim dismissed; proof of state coercion causing sale required under ZDEN Art. 5.
Sklep II Ips 284/2010
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling procedural renewal cannot exceed original decision scope.
Sodba I Up 1008/2005
Appeal dismissed: declaring a nationalization act void does not automatically create a basis for denationalization under the Denationalization Act.
Sodba I Up 107/2003
Denationalization allowed when replacement property was insufficient despite statutory silence on adequacy.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se umik revizije.

[JEDRO]

Kadar revident umakne revizijo, preden je o njej odločalo sodišče, le-to ugotovi njen umik.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je izdalo vmesni sklep, s katerim je ugotovilo, da sta I.S. in J.(I.)S. upravičenca do denacionalizacije nepremičnin, ki so prešle v državno last na podlagi menjalne pogodbe z dne 4.12.1951. Pritožbo prvega nasprotnega udeleženca proti temu sklepu je višje sodišče zavrnilo in potrdilo izpodbijani sklep.

Proti slednjemu sklepu je vložil revizijo drugi nasprotni udeleženec zaradi "bistvenih kršitev določb pravdnega postopka, predvsem pa zaradi uporabe materialnega prava". Z vlogo z dne 12.5.1995 pa je drugi nasprotni udeleženec sporočil Vrhovnemu sodišču SR, da umika vloženo revizijo.

Po 399. členu v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 349. člena zakona o pravdnem postopku (ob uporabi 37. člena zakona o nepravdnem postopku) lahko stranka umakne že vloženo revizijo, dokler revizijsko sodišče ne izda o njej odločbe. Ker gre za takšen primer, je moralo sodišče ugotoviti umik revizije.