Court dismisses appeal withdrawal by ruling that the court must formally confirm the withdrawal if filed before a decision.
Slovenia (SI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court ruled that the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal was legally ineffective because the court had not yet issued a decision on the appeal itself. The appellant had previously lost a first-instance judgment regarding the termination of a tenancy and attempted to withdraw the appeal after reaching an out-of-court settlement. The court held that under the relevant procedural law, a party may withdraw an appeal only before the appellate court renders a decision, necessitating a formal ruling to confirm the withdrawal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArticle 399 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 349, paragraph 2: If a party withdraws an appeal before the appellate court issues a decision, the court must rule on the withdrawal of the appeal.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Ugotovi se umik revizije.
[JEDRO]
Če revident umakne revizijo, preden je o njej odločilo revizijsko sodišče, s sklepom ugotovi umik revizije.
[OBRAZLOŽITEV]
Sodišče prve stopnje je razsodilo, da je prvi toženi stranki prenehalo stanovanjsko razmerje na sobah v Ljubljani, in da morata toženca ti sobi izprazniti in izročiti ključe tožeči stranki. Pritožbo tožene stranke je višje sodišče zavrnilo in potrdilo izpodbijano sodbo.
Proti tej sodbi je vložila revizijo tožena stranka zaradi zmotne uporabe materialnega prava. Z vlogo z dne 26.5.1995 pa je sporočila, da so pravdne stranke dosegle izvensodni sporazum, zaradi česar umika revizijo.
Po 399. členu v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 349. člena zakona o pravdnem postopku lahko stranka umakne že vloženo revizijo, dokler revizijsko sodišče ne izda o njej odločbe. Ker gre za takšen primer, je moralo sodišče ugotoviti umik revizije.