Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 15/95 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1995:I.R.15.95 AI generated

Supreme Court allows transfer of enforcement case to another court due to creditor's employment there.

Case Number Sklep I R 15/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia approved a request to transfer an enforcement proceeding to a different competent court. The creditor employed as a judicial enforcement officer at the originally competent district court argued that the employee's presence there would facilitate the process. The court ruled that the employee's employment at the local enforcement office constituted a significant reason for designating another court, thereby validating the transfer request.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

68. člen ZPP; 14. člen ZIP: The Supreme Court may designate another competent court for a case if it is evident that the proceedings will be easier conducted or if other significant reasons exist, such as the debtor's employment at the local enforcement office.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement proceedings judicial enforcement officer court jurisdiction procedural transfer significant reasons ZPP article 68 ZIP article 14

Cited Legislation

AI generated
68. člen ZPP
14. člen ZIP
AI generated
VSRS sklep I R 117/2015
Supreme Court allows transfer of case due to judge's assistant employment at requesting court being a significant reason under ZPP 67.
Sklep I R 13/2005
Supreme Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction due to alleged bias as insufficient grounds under ZPP Art. 67.
Sklep I R 10/2011
Supreme Court transfers case to another district court due to judge's father being a party, ensuring impartiality.
Sklep I R 38/2011
Supreme Court allows transfer of case to another court when a party is employed there as a clerk.
Sklep I R 69/2008
Inheritance proceedings dismissed as non-contentious; judge's employment does not require court transfer.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej zadevi se določi Okrajno sodišče v Domžalah.

[JEDRO]

Okoliščina, da je dolžnik zaposlen kot sodni izvršitelj na okrajnem sodišču, ki je krajevno pristojno za izvršbo, je tehten razlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča. Zato je predlog utemeljen.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Upnik je vložil izvršilni predlog pri Okrajnem sodišču v ... Ker je dolžnik zaposlen na izvršilnem oddelku kot sodni izvršitelj, to sodišče predlaga delegacijo po 68.členu ZPP (Zakon o pravdnem postopku) v zvezi s 14. členom ZIP (Zakon o izvršilnem postopku).

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po določilu 68.člena ZPP v zvezi s 14. členom ZIP lahko Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije kot najvišje redno sodišče v državi določi, naj postopa v posamezni zadevi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, če je očitno, da se bo tako lažje opravil postopek ali če so zato drugi tehtni razlogi. Okoliščina, da je dolžnik zaposlen kot sodni izvršitelj na okrajnem sodišču, ki je krajevno pristojno za izvršbo, je tehten razlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča. Zato je predlog utemeljen.