Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep VIII Ips 382/2008 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:VIII.IPS.382.2008 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal case where defendant withdrew revision after first instance judgment.

Case Number Sklep VIII Ips 382/2008
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that the defendant withdrew their revision appeal. The first instance court had found the termination of employment due to disability unlawful and ordered reinstatement. Since the defendant voluntarily withdrew the revision, the court formally recorded this withdrawal and dismissed the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZPP 334. člen 2. in 3. odstavek; ZPP 383. člen: When a party withdraws a revision appeal, the court must record the withdrawal and dismiss the appeal as inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal revision procedure employment termination disability grounds inadmissible appeal labor law voluntary withdrawal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
ZPP 334. člen 2. odstavek
ZPP 334. člen 3. odstavek
ZPP 383. člen
AI generated
VDSS Sodba Pdp 394/2023
Appeal dismissed; employer not required to reorganize job for partial disability, only offer transfer.
VDSS sodba Pdp 886/2015
Appeal dismissed; employer lawfully terminated disabled employee's contract per ZDR-1 and ZPIZ-1 provisions.
VDS sodba Pdp 492/2006
Appeal dismissed; employer must offer re-employment matching prior job qualifications for disabled workers under ZDR.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 263/2022
Appeal dismissed; employer not liable for job accommodation without recognized occupational rehabilitation rights under ZPIZ-2.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 88/2024
Appeal dismissed: Employee unable to work due to health risks cannot force employer to reorganize job duties.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je tožena stranka umaknila revizijo.

[JEDRO]

Vrhovno sodišče je na podlagi drugega in tretjega odstavka 334. člena v zvezi s 383. členom ZPP izdalo sklep, v katerem je ugotovilo, da je tožena stranka umaknila vloženo revizijo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku, da je odpoved pogodbe o zaposlitvi iz razloga invalidnosti nezakonita in se razveljavi, in da je zato tožena stranka dolžna tožnico pozvati nazaj na delo in ji za nazaj tudi priznati vse pravice iz delovnega razmerja.

Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

Zoper pravnomočno sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožena stranka vložila pravočasno revizijo, ki jo je z vlogo z dne 21. 11. 2008 umaknila. Zato je revizijsko sodišče na podlagi drugega in tretjega odstavka 334. člena ZPP v zvezi s 383. členom ZPP sklenilo, kot izhaja iz izreka sklepa.