Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep IV Ips 11/2007 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2007:IV.IPS.11.2007 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses defense lawyer's request for legality protection due to lack of standing under traffic law.

Case Number Sklep IV Ips 11/2007
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defense lawyer's request for legality protection regarding a traffic offense verdict. The defense argued for the annulment of the driver's license revocation, but the court noted that only the prosecutor or the aggrieved party has standing to file such a request under the Traffic Offenses Act. Consequently, the court ruled the lawyer lacked the legal right to initiate this procedural remedy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. odstavek 169. člena Zakona o prekrških; 2. odstavek 423. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku: A defense lawyer lacks standing to file a request for legality protection against a traffic offense decision unless specifically authorized by law, as only the prosecutor or the aggrieved party may initiate such proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
standing for legality protection traffic offenses act defense lawyer authority procedural standing requirement driver license revocation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odstavek 169. člena Zakona o prekrških (ZP-1)
2. odstavek 423. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku (ZKP)
171. člen Zakona o prekrških (ZP-1)
AI generated
VSK sklep EPVDp 34/2013
Appeal dismissed; court cannot extend statutory deadline for driver license suspension program enrollment proof.
Sklep IV Ips 38/2007
Defense lawyer's request for legality protection in traffic offense dismissed as only prosecutor may file it.
VSK sklep EPVDp 15/2015
Appeal dismissed; committing a new serious traffic offense voids suspension of license revocation.
VSK sklep EPVDp 20/2014
Appeal dismissed; driver fined for serious traffic violation requiring immediate license revocation enforcement.
VSK sklep PRp 67/2010
Court rejects appeal on service of process rule where non-acceptance within 15 days deems service effective on deadline day.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zahteva zagovornika storilca M.K. za varstvo zakonitosti se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti vloži državni tožilec po uradni dolžnosti ali na pobudo osebe, ki ima pravico do pritožbe zoper sodbo o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z uvodoma navedeno odločbo je Višje sodišče v Kopru zavrnilo pritožbo zagovornika storilca M.K. in potrdilo sklep Okrajnega sodišča v Sežani z dne 16.11.2006, s katerim je bilo storilcu izrečeno prenehanje veljavnosti vozniškega dovoljenja.

Zoper odločbo sodišča druge stopnje je obdolženčev zagovornik dne 6.2.2007 vložil zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti ter predlagal, da Vrhovno sodišče izpodbijani sklep razveljavi.

Po 2. odstavku 169. člena Zakona o prekrških (ZP-1) zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti lahko vloži državni tožilec po uradni dolžnosti ali na pobudo osebe, ki ima pravico do pritožbe zoper sodbo o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje.

V obravnavani zadevi je zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti vložil storilčev zagovornik, ki po citirani določbi ni imel te pravice. Glede na navedeno je Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije zahtevo zagovornika storilca M.K. za varstvo zakonitosti skladno z 2. odstavkom 423. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku (ZKP) v zvezi s 171. členom ZP-1 zavrglo.