Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Ips 138/2007 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2007:I.IPS.138.2007 AI generated

Victim as private prosecutor dismissed for lack of standing to file request for protection of legality.

Case Number Sklep I Ips 138/2007
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the request for protection of legality filed by the victim acting as a private prosecutor. The criminal proceedings had been legally terminated regarding the victim's objection to the indictment for business fraud, forgery, and false accusation. The court ruled that the victim lacks standing to file this extraordinary legal remedy because only the state prosecutor, the accused, or their defender are authorized under the Criminal Procedure Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

1. odstavek 421. ZKP; 2. odstavek 422. ZKP; 2. odstavek 423. ZKP: A victim acting as a private prosecutor is not an authorized party to file a request for protection of legality.

Keywords

AI generated
private prosecutor standing protection of legality Criminal Procedure Act victim rights extraordinary legal remedy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
1. odstavek 421. ZKP
2. odstavek 422. ZKP
2. odstavek 423. ZKP
367. ZKP
AI generated
VSL Sodba II Kp 50234/2016
Appeal dismissed; contract not lease, defendant is agent not principal, surety not liable for own debt.
Sklep I Ips 43718/2010-16
Private prosecutor and victim dismissed for filing appeal after defendant's death under Slovenian Criminal Procedure Code.
VSK Sklep II Kp 3360/2016
Appeal dismissed; victim's compensation does not reduce amount of illegal profit for fraud charge.
Sklep I Ips 348/2006
Supreme Court dismisses appeal by victim's representative as statutory standing is tautologically limited.
VSL Sklep II Kp 15863/2015
Appeal dismissed; fraud charge requires specific intent description, not just later conduct.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zahteva pooblaščenca oškodovanca kot tožilca B.G. za varstvo zakonitosti se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Oškodovanec kot tožilec ni med upravičenci za vložitev zahteve za varstvo zakonitosti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z uvodoma navedenima sklepoma je bil kazenski postopek ob reševanju ugovora zoper obtožbo oškodovanca kot tožilca zaradi kaznivih dejanj poslovne goljufije po 1. odstavku 234.a člena, ponareditve ali uničenja poslovnih listin po 1. odstavku 240. in krive ovadbe po 4. v zvezi s 1. odstavkom 288. člena KZ pravnomočno ustavljen.

Zoper to pravnomočno odločbo je pooblaščenec oškodovanca kot tožilca vložil zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti, ki jo je Vrhovno sodišče v skladu z 2. odstavkom 423. člena v zvezi z 2. odstavkom 422. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku (ZKP) zavrglo, saj jo je vložila oseba, ki te pravice nima. Prvi odstavek 421. člena ZKP namreč določa, da smejo zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti vložiti državni tožilec RS, obdolženec in zagovornik (po obdolženčevi smrti pa v njegovo korist tudi osebe iz 367. člena ZKP), oziroma zasebnega tožilca in oškodovanca kot tožilca ni med upravičenci za vložitev tega izrednega pravnega sredstva.