Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Pr 46/94 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1994:I.PR.44.94 AI generated

Supreme Court transfers case to another court because plaintiff is daughter of appellate judge.

Case Number Sklep I Pr 46/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the request to transfer jurisdiction to the Higher Court in Ljubljana. The plaintiff, daughter of the judge at the Higher Court hearing the appeal, argued this relationship created a conflict of interest. The court ruled that this familial connection constitutes a significant reason for designating a different competent court to ensure impartiality.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 68 of the Act on Civil Procedure; The Supreme Court may designate another competent court within its jurisdiction if it is evident that the proceedings will be easier or if there are other significant reasons, such as the plaintiff being a child of the judge hearing the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure jurisdiction transfer conflict of interest family relationship impartiality requirement Supreme Court power competent court designation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 68 of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
Sklep II Ips 120/2012
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in property dispute where appeal value under 40,000 EUR threshold. Appeal rejected due to insufficient value exceeding statutory limit.
VSL Sodba in sklep I Cp 246/2022
Appeal court partially allowed appeal, remanding co-ownership share calculation due to erroneous classification of property.
VSM Sodba I Cp 737/2020
Appeal dismissed; cohabitation use does not prove joint ownership of property or business shares.
VSL sklep I Cp 479/2016
Appeal granted; divorce property division reversed due to incomplete income assessment over entire marriage period.
VSL sodba II Cp 4242/2008
Spousal contributions to household and children care establish equal shares in marital community property under ZZZDR Art. 159.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ugodi in se za odločanje na drugi stopnji v tej zadevi določi kot pristojno sodišče Višje sodišče v Ljubljani.

[JEDRO]

Okoliščina, da je predlagateljica hči sodnice na sodišču, ki bi moralo odločati o pritožbi nasprotnega udeleženca, je tehten razlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

S sklepom Temeljnega sodišča z dne 22.9.1994 je bil nasprotni udeleženec napoten na pravdo z zahtevkom na ugotovitev, da znaša njegov delež na skupnem premoženju 6/10, delež predlagateljice pa 4/10. Proti temu sklepu je nasprotni udeleženec vložil pritožbo, o kateri bi moralo odločati Višje sodišče v ... To sodišče je predlagalo, da se določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, ker je predlagateljica hči sodnice Višjega sodišča v ...

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po 68.čl. Zakona o pravdnem postopku lahko Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije kot najvišje redno sodišče v državi določi, naj postopa v posamezni zadevi drugo pristojno sodišče z njegovega območja, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi. Okoliščina, da je predlagateljica hči sodnice na sodišču, ki bi moralo odločati o pritožbi nasprotnega udeleženca, je tehten razlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča. Zato je vrhovno sodišče predlogu ugodilo.