Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Ips 29/2003 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2003:I.IPS.29.2003 AI generated

Victim as prosecutor cannot file request for legality protection; only state prosecutor, accused, or defense attorney may do so.

Case Number Sklep I Ips 29/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the victim's request for legality protection as inadmissible because the victim, acting as a prosecutor, lacks standing under the Criminal Procedure Act. While the victim is a party to the criminal proceedings, the law restricts this specific extraordinary remedy to the state prosecutor, the accused, or their defense attorney. Consequently, the court ruled that the victim cannot initiate this procedural step, thereby rejecting the application entirely.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

1. odstavek 421. člen ZKP; 2. odstavek 422. člen ZKP: A victim acting as a prosecutor cannot file a request for legality protection; only the state prosecutor, the accused, or the defense attorney possesses the requisite standing to initiate this remedy.

Keywords

AI generated
request for legality protection standing of victim as prosecutor Criminal Procedure Act extraordinary legal remedy inadmissible application procedural standing victim's role in proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
1. odstavek 421. člen Zakona o kazenskem postopku (ZKP)
2. odstavek 422. člen Zakona o kazenskem postopku (ZKP)

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zahteva oškodovanca kot tožilca R.Š. za varstvo zakonitosti se zavrže kot nedovoljena.

[JEDRO]

Oškodovanec kot tožilec ne more vložiti zahteve za varstvo zakonitosti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti smejo po določilu 1. odstavka 421. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku (ZKP) vložiti državni tožilec Republike Slovenije, obdolženec in zagovornik, po obdolženčevi smrti pa jo smejo v njegovo korist vložiti tudi osebe iz drugega odstavka 367. člena ZKP. Oškodovanec kot tožilec, čeprav je stranka v kazenskem postopku, torej ne more vložiti tega izrednega pravnega sredstva. Zato je Vrhovno sodišče zahtevo oškodovanca kot tožilca R.Š. za varstvo zakonitosti zavrglo kot nedovoljeno (2. odstavek 422. člena ZKP).