Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Ips 81/2001 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2001:I.IPS.81.2001 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request for legality protection withdrawn by defendant under ZKP Art. 390 and 423.2.4.

Case Number Sklep I Ips 81/2001
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the defendant's request for legality protection after the defendant withdrew it during the main hearing. Although the defendant initially argued errors in factual findings regarding flight suspicion and recidivism risk, the withdrawal rendered the request inadmissible under Article 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Consequently, the court applied Article 423, paragraph 2, item 4 of the same act to reject the request as impermissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Article 423, paragraph 2, item 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act: A request for legality protection withdrawn by the applicant is deemed inadmissible and must be rejected by the court.

Keywords

AI generated
legality protection withdrawal of request inadmissible request Criminal Procedure Act ZKP Article 390 ZKP Article 423 procedural withdrawal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Article 423, paragraph 2, item 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act
AI generated
VSC Sklep I Kp 31411/2021
Appeal against detention extension dismissed; court found first instance considered defense arguments despite lack of explicit response.
VSRS Sklep I Kp 48115/2012-1468
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, upholding detention due to recidivism risk and prior conviction.
VSC Sklep I Kp 11301/2022
Court dismisses appeal against detention order citing high risk of reoffending and proportionality.
Sodba XI Ips 7062/2012-109
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against detention order due to lack of procedural violation regarding flight risk assessment.
Sodba XI Ips 54601/2011-78
Supreme Court dismisses bail protection request citing mandatory detention due to cannabis cultivation and public safety risks.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zahteva obd. P.G. za varstvo zakonitosti se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Ker je vložnik umaknil zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti, se jo ob upoštevanju določila 390. člena ZKP šteje kot nedovoljeno. V skladu z določilom 2. odstavka 423. člena ZKP jo je zato treba zavreči.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Senat Okrožnega sodišča v Ljubljani je s sklepom z dne 8.3.2001 zoper obd. P.G. odredil pripor iz razloga 1. in 3. točke 1. odstavka 201. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku (ZKP). Pritožbo zagovornikov obdolženca zoper ta sklep je Višje sodišče v Ljubljani s sklepom z dne 16.3.2001 zavrnilo kot neutemeljeno.

Obdolženec je zoper navedeni pravnomočen sklep dne 20.3.2001 vložil zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti, v kateri uveljavlja zmotno ugotovitev dejanskega stanja v zvezi s pripornima razlogoma begosumnosti in ponovitvene nevarnosti in kršitev po 11. točki 1. odstavka 371. člena ZKP.

Na glavni obravnavi dne 5.4.2001 je obdolženec po razglasitvi sodbe izjavil, da zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti umika. Takšno zahtevo je ob upoštevanju določila 390. člena ZKP treba šteti kot nedovoljeno in jo v skladu z določilom 2. odstavka 423. člena ZKP zavreči.