Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Ips 56/2001 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2001:I.IPS.56.2001 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request for legal protection against a non-final detention order decision.

Case Number Sklep I Ips 56/2001
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the defense's request for legal protection regarding a final ruling denying the release of a co-accused. The defense argued that the detention order should be lifted, but the lower court had only refused this specific request. The court ruled that legal protection under Article 420 of the Criminal Procedure Act applies only to final rulings on detention orders, not to rulings denying such requests.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 420, paragraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Article 422, paragraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act: A request for legal protection is inadmissible against a final decision refusing a request to lift a detention order, as such a decision does not constitute a final ruling on the detention order itself.

Keywords

AI generated
legal protection request detention order final ruling requirement Criminal Procedure Act inadmissible appeal co-accused release procedural standing

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 420, paragraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Article 422, paragraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act
AI generated
VSC Sklep I Kp 9458/2019
Appeal against detention order dismissed; lower court's reasoning deemed sufficient and no procedural violation found.
VSK Sklep I Kp 65504/2022
Appeal dismissed; prior detention does not prove rehabilitation; drug trafficking evidence supports continued detention.
Sodba I Ips 374/2004
Appeal dismissed; detention upheld as necessary for public safety despite defendant's claim of low risk.
Sodba I Ips 227/2004
Supreme Court dismisses defense request for legality protection regarding detention order in drug trafficking case.
Sodba I Ips 331/2000
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for protection of legality regarding detention order due to lack of procedural violation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zahteva zagovornika obt. B.V. za varstvo zakonitosti se zavrže kot nedovoljena.

[JEDRO]

Zoper sklep, s katerim je zavrnjen zagovornikov predlog za odpravo pripora, ni mogoče vložiti zahteve za varstvo zakonitosti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Okrožno sodišče v Kopru je s pravnomočnim sklepom z dne 10.1.2001 zavrnilo predlog zagovornika obt. B.V. z dne 8.1.2001, da se zoper obtoženko odpravi pripor.

Zoper ta sklep je zagovornik obt. B.V. dne 16.1.2001 vložil zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti, v kateri predlaga, da Vrhovno sodišče izpodbijani sklep spremeni tako, da pripor zoper obtoženko odpravi.

Zahteva za varstvo zakonitosti ni dovoljena.

V določilu 4. odstavka 420. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku (ZKP) je predpisano, da se ne glede na določbo prvega odstavka tega člena sme med kazenskim postopkom, ki ni pravnomočno končan, vložiti zahteva za varstvo zakonitosti samo zoper pravnomočno odločbo o odreditvi pripora in podaljšanju pripora.

S sklepom, katerega zagovornik obt. B.V. izpodbija z zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti, ni bilo odločeno o odreditvi oziroma o podaljšanju pripora, pač pa je bil zavrnjen predlog zagovornika obtoženke za odpravo pripora. Zoper tak sklep pa po povsem jasnem določilu 4. odstavka 420. člena ZKP ni mogoče vložiti zahteve za varstvo zakonitosti.

Vrhovno sodišče je zato zahtevo zagovornika obt. B.V. za varstvo zakonitosti zavrglo kot nedovoljeno (2. odstavek 422. člena ZKP).