Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Ips 214/97 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1999:I.IPS.214.97 AI generated

Supreme Court suspends execution of final criminal judgment due to reliance on illegally obtained evidence.

Case Number Sklep I Ips 214/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia suspended the execution of a final criminal judgment against R.K. regarding theft and attempted theft. The defense argued the conviction relied on evidence obtained through an illegal house search, violating procedural rights under Article 371 of the Criminal Procedure Act. The court agreed that the execution must be suspended pending the resolution of the legality of the evidence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 423, paragraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Article 371, paragraphs 8 and 11, item 1; The Supreme Court may order suspension of execution of a final judgment when the defense requests protection of legality based on violations of procedural rules, specifically the use of illegally obtained evidence.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of execution illegally obtained evidence house search procedural violation Criminal Procedure Act final judgment protection of legality

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 423, paragraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Article 371, paragraphs 8 and 11, item 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Article 371, paragraph 3, item 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act
AI generated
Sodba I Ips 152/2010
Appeal court dismisses appeal against conviction for fraud, ruling that judicial conviction requires only reasoned belief without doubt.
Sodba I Ips 41559/2010-464
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on witness privilege and cross-examination rights in joint fraud cases.
Sodba I Ips 63358/2010-170
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on procedural grounds, rejecting claims regarding continued offense and conditional sentence revocation.
Sodba I Ips 253/2006
Appeal court rejects defense request for procedural legality protection regarding language rights in criminal proceedings.
VSRS Sodba I Ips 46668/2015
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on conviction change, ruling courts bound by factual description not abstract legal definitions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

V kazenski zadevi zoper obs. R.K. se odredi prekinitev izvršitve pravnomočne sodbe Okrožnega sodišča v Novi Gorici z dne 13.12.1996 v zvezi s sodbo Višjega sodišča v Kopru z dne 8.5.1997.

[JEDRO]

Vrhovno sodišče je pri preizkusu zahteve za varstvo zakonitosti v skladu s pooblastilom 4.odst.423.čl. ZKP ocenilo, da je potrebno glede na vsebino zahteve odrediti, da se izvršitev pravnomočne sodbe prekine.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Okrožno sodišče v Novi Gorici je s sodbo z dne 13.12.1996, v zvezi s sodbo Višjega sodišča v Kopru z dne 8.5.1997 R.K.-ja zaradi kaznivih dejanj velike tatvine po 1. točki 1. odstavka 212. člena KZ, poskusa velike tatvine po 1. točki 1. odstavka 212. člena v zvezi 22. členom KZ, tatvine po 1. odstavku 211. člena KZ in tatvine po 1. in 2.

odstavku 211. člena KZ obsodilo na kazen 3 leta in 10 mesecev zapora.

Zagovornika obsojenca sta zoper navedeno pravnomočno sodbo vložila zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti, v kateri uveljavljata bistvene kršitve določb kazenskega postopka iz 8. in 11. točke 1. odstavka 371. člena ZKP. Posebej poudarjata, da je sodišče zagrešilo absolutno bistveno kršitev postopka po 8. točki 1. odstavka 371. člena ZKP, ker je obsodilno sodbo oprlo na nezakonito pridobljene dokaze, to je dokaze, pridobljene pri hišni preiskavi, ki je bila opravljena na nezakonit način. Predlagata, da Vrhovno sodišče izpodbijano sodbo razveljavi in vrne zadevo sodišču prve stopnje v novo sojenje.

Predlagata tudi, da prvostopno sodišče prekine izvršitev pravnomočne sodbe na podlagi 3. odstavka 422. člena ZKP.

Vrhovno sodišče je pri preizkusu zahteve za varstvo zakonitosti v skladu s pooblastilom 4. odstavka 423. člena ZKP ocenilo, da je potrebno glede na vsebino zahteve odrediti, da se izvršitev pravnomočne sodbe prekine.