Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sodba I Ips 190/98 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1998:I.IPS.190.98 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses private prosecutor's request for legality protection as inadmissible under ZKP. Private prosecutor lacks standing per Article 421(1) ZKP.

Case Number Sodba I Ips 190/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the private prosecutor's request for legality protection as inadmissible. The private prosecutor D.L.K. challenged final judgments against A.P. for procedural violations and excessive costs, arguing for the annulment of the decisions. The court ruled that only the state prosecutor, the convicted person, or their defender may file such requests, explicitly excluding private prosecutors under Article 421(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 421(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; Article 423(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act: A request for legality protection may be filed only by the state prosecutor, the convicted person, or their defender, and not by a private prosecutor.

Keywords

AI generated
legality protection request private prosecutor standing Criminal Procedure Act inadmissible request supreme court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 421(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act
Article 423(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL Sodba II Cp 1812/2020
Appeal partially allowed; court corrects inheritance will amount based on expert handwriting analysis findings.
Sodba I Ips 149/95
Supreme Court dismisses appeal claiming defamation conviction was unjustified due to lack of intent to insult.
Sklep VIII Pri 20/2006
Appeal dismissed; appeal against refusal of review rejected as no deviation from Supreme Court practice or arbitrariness found.
VSL sklep III Ip 2107/2015
Court partially allows transfer of matured alimony claims but rejects transfer of future claims under OZ Art. 417.
VSL sklep III Cp 1323/2001
Appeal against enforcement court order in execution proceedings is inadmissible as final decisions cannot be challenged.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Zahteva zasebnega tožilca D.L.K. za varstvo zakonitosti se zavrže kot nedovoljena.

[JEDRO]

Po določbah 1. odstavka 421. člena ZKP smejo zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti vložiti državni tožilec Republike Slovenije, obsojenec in zagovornik, ne pa tudi zasebni tožilec, ki jo je vložil v obravnavanem primeru, zato je Vrhovno sodišče na podlagi 2. odstavka 423. člena ZKP njegovo zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti zavrglo kot nedovoljeno.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanima pravnomočnima sodbama, ki sta navedeni v uvodu tega sklepa, je bila A.P. oproščena obtožbe za kaznivo dejanje opravljanja, storjeno s tiskom, po 2. v zvezi s 1. odstavkom 172. člena KZ.

Zoper ti sodbi je zasebni tožilec D.L.K. po svojem pooblaščencu vložil zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti zaradi bistvene kršitve določb kazenskega postopka iz 11. točke 1. odstavka 371. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku (ZKP), zmotne in nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja in zaradi neprimerno visoke povprečnine za postopek na drugi stopnji. Predlaga, da se izpodbijani sodbi "odpravi".

Zahteva zasebnega tožilca za varstvo zakonitosti ni dovoljena.

Po določbah 1. odstavka 421. člena ZKP smejo zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti vložiti državni tožilec Republike Slovenije, obsojenec in zagovornik, ne pa tudi zasebni tožilec, ki jo je vložil v obravnavanem primeru, zato je Vrhovno sodišče na podlagi 2. odstavka 423. člena ZKP njegovo zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti zavrglo kot nedovoljeno.