Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Pr 33/94 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1994:I.PR.33.94 AI generated

Court transfers case to another competent court because one defendant is a unit of the original court.

Case Number Sklep I Pr 33/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia ordered the transfer of proceedings from the Basic Court in Ljubljana to another competent court. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against a defendant who was a unit of the Basic Court, prompting a request for delegation under Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act. The court ruled that the defendant's status as a unit of the original court constituted a significant reason for transferring the case to facilitate the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act; The fact that one of the defendants is a unit of the court originally seized of the case is a significant ground for designating another competent court.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Act court jurisdiction delegation of proceedings defendant unit competent court procedural efficiency transfer of case

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSRS sklep VIII DoR 3/2015
Supreme Court rejects review application against appellate court's ruling on subject-matter jurisdiction. Review requires finality of proceedings which this ruling lacks.
VDS sklep Pdp 1095/99
Labor court jurisdiction determined by employer's seat location, not employee's work area, dismissing appeal.
Sklep I R 97/2003
Appeal dismissed; sibling witness proposal does not justify transferring jurisdiction to another court.
VSRS Sklep I R 57/2025
Supreme Court transfers custody of mental health admission case to Maribor court for efficiency.
VSRS Sklep III R 17/2019
Supreme Court rejects jurisdiction transfer request based on case file familiarity and processing speed arguments.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej zadevi se določi Temeljno sodišče v ...

[JEDRO]

Okoliščina, da je ena izmed toženih stranka enota sodišča, katero je sicer krajevno pristojno za odločanje, je tehten razlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Tožeča stranka je vložila tožbo pri Temeljnem sodišču v Ljubljani, enota v .... To sodišče predlaga delegacijo, ker je ena izmed toženih strank.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po določilu 68.člena ZPP lahko Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije kot najvišje redno sodišče v državi določi, naj postopa v posamezni zadevi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, če je očitno, da se bo tako lažje opravil postopek ali če so zato drugi tehtni razlogi. Okoliščina, da je ena izmed toženih stranka enota sodišča, katero je sicer krajevno pristojno za odločanje, je tehten razlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča. Zato je predlog utemeljen.