Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep X Ips 484/2007 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2008:X.IPS.484.2007 AI generated

Administrative court halts proceedings because the appellant withdrew the appeal before the second instance court decided.

Case Number Sklep X Ips 484/2007
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia halted the administrative proceedings because the appellant withdrew the appeal before the second-instance court rendered a decision. The first-instance court had previously dismissed the plaintiff's lawsuit and cost claim, prompting the appeal which was subsequently withdrawn via a timely application. The court ruled that under the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act and the Code of Civil Procedure, a party may withdraw an appeal at any time prior to the second-instance court issuing its ruling, thereby terminating the case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. odstavek 334. člen ZPP v povezavi s 383. členom ZPP; 2. odstavek 14. člen ZUS-1: A party may withdraw an appeal at any time before the second-instance court issues a ruling, resulting in the termination of the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal administrative dispute resolution second instance proceedings termination of proceedings appellant's right procedural withdrawal supreme court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odstavek 334. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
383. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
1. odstavek 22. člen Zakona o upravnem sporu (ZUS-1)
2. odstavek 14. člen Zakona o upravnem sporu (ZUS-1)
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cp 3228/2016
Appeal dismissed; new evidence after trial is admissible if not previously available through fault.
VSL sodba I Cp 4063/2009
Appeal dismissed; co-owner cannot demand payment directly but must pay to the reserve fund account.
VSL sklep I Cp 1254/99
Court dismisses possession claim as plaintiff failed to prove actual possession despite alleged fear of eviction.
Sklep I Up 559/2008
Appeal dismissed; late filing and improper grounds for retrial rejected under Administrative Dispute Resolution Act.
VSL Sklep II Cp 1392/2017
Appeal court overturns first instance judgment on insurance liability due to failure to properly weigh conflicting expert opinions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Postopek se ustavi.

[JEDRO]

Ker je v tem primeru tožeča stranka revizijo umaknila, preden je sodišče druge stopnje o njej odločilo, je revizijsko sodišče postopek ustavilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je s sodbo (1. točka izreka), št. U 381/2005-9 z dne 17.4.2007 zavrnilo tožbo tožeče stranke zoper odločbo tožene stranke z dne 10.6.2005 ter zavrnilo zahtevo tožeče stranke za povrnitev stroškov postopka (2. točka izreka). Zoper navedeno sodbo je tožeča stranka vložila pravočasno revizijo, ki pa jo je z vlogo, ki jo je Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije prejelo dne 24.12.2007, umaknila.

Po določbi 2. odstavka 334. člena v povezavi s 383. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), ki se po določbi 1. odstavka 22. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu (Uradni list RS, št. 105/2006, ZUS-1) primerno uporablja za vprašanja postopka, ki niso urejena s tem zakonom, torej tudi za umik revizije, lahko stranka, dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe, umakne že vloženo revizijo. Ker je v tem primeru tožeča stranka revizijo umaknila preden je sodišče druge stopnje o njej odločilo, je revizijsko sodišče v skladu z navedenimi določbami ZPP in ZUS-1, na podlagi 2. odstavka 14. člena ZUS-1 postopek ustavilo.