Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep X Ips 625/2007 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2007:X.IPS.625.2007 AI generated

Administrative appeal dismissed when appellant withdraws review before review court issues decision.

Case Number Sklep X Ips 625/2007
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia suspended the proceedings because the appellant withdrew their review application before the review court rendered a decision. The first-instance court had rejected the plaintiff's claim against the defendant's administrative ruling of July 20, 2006, prompting the review filing which was subsequently withdrawn via letter on November 29, 2007. The court applied the Code of Civil Procedure to the Administrative Procedure Act regarding procedural gaps, establishing that withdrawal is valid only until the review court issues its ruling, thereby halting the case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZUS-1, 22. odst. 1; ZPP, 383. člen: If a party withdraws a review application before the review court issues a decision, the review proceedings are suspended and the administrative appeal procedure is terminated.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal withdrawal of review suspension of proceedings review court decision procedural gap

Cited Legislation

AI generated
22. odst. 1 ZUS-1
383. člen ZPP
AI generated
VDSS sklep Pdp 1275/2010
Appeal dismissed; filing an extraordinary remedy without legal standing is inadmissible and not a procedural defect.
VDSS Sodba Psp 116/2018
Social court dismisses appeal; mandatory pension insurance applies to company partners/managers absent employment contracts.
VSL Sodba II Cp 1771/2024
Passenger liability reduced by 30% due to failure to use handrail on slippery train steps.
VDSS sodba Psp 166/2013
Court dismisses appeal; pensioner status excludes entitlement to unemployment waiting period allowance.
Sklep I Up 10/2003
Slovenian Supreme Court allows withdrawal of appeal before second instance judgment is issued.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Postopek se ustavi.

[JEDRO]

Če revident umakne revizijo, preden je revizijsko sodišče o njej odločilo, se postopek ustavi.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijano sodbo je prvostopno sodišče zavrnilo tožbo tožeče stranke zoper odločbo tožene stranke z dne 20. 7 .2006. Zoper navedeno sodbo je tožeča stranka vložila revizijo, ki pa jo je umaknila s svojim dopisom z dne 29. 11. 2007, ki ga je vrhovno sodišče prejelo 29. 11. 2007.

Po prvem odstavku 22. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu (ZUS-1, Uradni list RS, št. 105/06 in 26/07 - sklep US) se v upravnem sporu za vprašanja postopka, ki v ZUS-1 niso urejena, primerno uporabljajo določbe Zakona o pravdnem postopku, to je sedaj ZPP-UPB3 (Uradni list RS, št. 73/07). V ZUS-1 vprašanje umika revizije ni urejeno. Po določbi 383. člena ZPP velja v postopku v zvezi z revizijo, če ni v 367. do 382. členu ZPP drugače določeno, smiselno med drugim tudi določba drugega odstavka 334. člena. Po tej določbi pa lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pritožbo, dokler o njej sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe, kar smiselno pomeni, da stranka lahko umakne revizijo, dokler o njej revizijsko sodišče ni izdalo odločbe.

Ker o reviziji tožeče stranke v tej zadevi revizijsko sodišče še ni odločilo, je zaradi umika revizije treba šteti, da je revizijski postopek ustavljen. V tej zadevi je odločal sodnik posameznik na podlagi drugega odstavka 14. člena ZUS-1.