Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 243/94 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1994:II.IPS.243.94 AI generated

Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses late appeal sent by registered mail, ruling it inadmissible due to missed deadline.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 243/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the appeal filed by the defendant against the second-instance judgment. The defendant argued for a new trial based on procedural violations, but the court found the appeal inadmissible because it was sent by registered mail on October 14, 1993, after the statutory deadline of October 11, 1993, had expired. Consequently, the court ruled that the appeal was untimely and dismissed the review proceedings in accordance with the Civil Procedure Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Articles 2, 4, 112 paragraphs 2 and 4, and 382 paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act; An appeal filed by registered mail after the statutory deadline is deemed untimely and inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Act timely appeal registered mail statutory deadline inadmissible review procedural defect Slovenian law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 2 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 4 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 112 paragraphs 2 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 382 paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 392 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
Sodba in sklep III Ips 83/94
Appeal partially allowed; interest on assigned debt voided; bank subsidiary guarantor liable for remaining debt.
VSL sodba II Cp 2102/99
Appeal dismissed; final judgment in small value disputes only allows challenge for material law errors or procedural violations.
Sodba II Ips 202/2003
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on multiple loans where repayment order must follow creditor's instruction absent prior agreement.
Sodba II Ips 172/95
Appeal dismissed; court findings on payment facts and evidence assessment are not reviewable in revision. Appeal dismissed; court findings on payment facts and evidence assessment are not reviewable in revision.
Sklep II Ips 278/94
Car insurance case reversed for delay; court ruled claimant must buy replacement car with delayed payout.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Pravočasnost revizije, če je ta poslana po pošti priporočeno.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je deloma ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku in toženi stranki naložilo plačilo 53.100,00 SIT z zakonitimi zamudnimi obrestmi in sicer od zneska 36.000,00 SIT od 16.4.1991, od preostalega zneska pa od 25.10.1992 do plačila. Sodišče druge stopnje je sodbo sodišča prve stopnje potrdilo, potem ko je zavrnilo pritožbo tožene stranke.

Tožena stranka vlaga proti sodbi sodišča druge stopnje revizijo zaradi bistvenih kršitev določb pravdnega postopka in zmotne uporabe materialnega prava. Revizijskemu sodišču predlaga, da reviziji ugodi tako, da tožbeni zahtevek zavrne.

Revizija je prepozna.

Iz podatkov spisa (vročilnica o vročitvi sodbe sodišča druge stopnje in uradni zaznamek na l.št. 60) je razvidno, da je pooblaščenec tožene stranke 10.9.1993 prejel z obravnavano revizijo izpodbijano sodbo sodišča druge stopnje. Revizijo je 14.10.1993 poslal po pošti priporočeno. Ob upoštevanju 2. in 4. odst. 112. čl. ZPP je rok za vložitev revizije (1. odst. 382. čl. ZPP) potekel 11.10.1993. Tako je potrebno šteti, da je revizija vložena prepozno. O njej je revizijsko sodišče zato odločilo, kot je razvidno iz izreka sklepa (392. čl. ZPP)