Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Up 227/2007 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2006:I.UP.227.2007 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses appeal withdrawal ruling confirming parties may withdraw appeals before second instance judgment.

Case Number Sklep I Up 227/2007
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia ruled that the appellant withdrew their appeal before the second-instance court issued a decision. The appellant had previously lost a first-instance lawsuit and filed an appeal, later withdrawing it via a separate application. The court confirmed the withdrawal based on the procedural rule allowing parties to retract appeals prior to a final judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. odstavek 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku; 1. odstavek 22. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu: A party may withdraw an appeal filed with the second-instance court at any time before that court renders a decision.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal withdrawal second instance procedure Zakon o upravnem sporu Zakon o pravdnem postopku procedural withdrawal supreme court ruling appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odstavek 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku
1. odstavek 22. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu
1. odstavek 59. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu
AI generated
VDSS sodba Psp 253/2002
Appeal allowed; unconstitutional 8-day deadline rule repealed by new law applies retroactively to pending cases.
Sodba I Up 825/2006
Denationalization appeal dismissed; built land without owner's title blocks return in kind under ZDen.
VDSS Sodba Psp 91/2018
Appeal court quashes first-instance social court ruling due to procedural violation of Article 7 of the Civil Procedure Act.
VSRS Sodba X Ips 44/2019
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding landlord's duty to verify tenant's asset conditions every five years.
Sodba X Ips 1616/2006
Supreme Court dismisses review for administrative enforcement where first instance court correctly ignored challenges to the underlying enforceable decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je tožeča stranka umaknila pritožbo.

[JEDRO]

Dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe lahko stranke umakne že vloženo pritožbo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je s sodbo U 260/2006-8 z dne 5.12.2006 na podlagi določbe 1. odstavka 59. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu (Uradni list RS, št. 50/97 in 70/2000, ZUS) zavrnilo tožbo tožeče stranke proti odločbi tožene stranke z dne 28.3.2006. Zoper navedeno sodbo je tožeča stranka dne 9.1.2007 vložila pritožbo ter predlagala, da se izpodbijana sodba razveljavi ter zadeva vrne sodišču prve stopnje v ponovni postopek. Z vlogo naslovljeno na Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije, Oddelek v Mariboru z dne 9.7.2007 je tožeča stranka omenjeno pritožbo umaknila.

Po določbi 2. odstavka 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (Uradni list RS, št. 36/04 - UPB), ki se po določbi 1. odstavka 22. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu (Uradni list RS, št. 105/2006, ZUS-1) primerno uporablja za vprašanja, ki jih ZUS-1 ne ureja, torej tudi za umik pritožbe, lahko stranka, dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe, umakne že vloženo pritožbo. Ker o pritožbi tožeče stranke sodišče še ni odločilo, je na podlagi omenjenih zakonskih določb ugotovilo, da je pritožba umaknjena.