Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 767/93 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1994:II.IPS.767.93 AI generated

Supreme Court notes withdrawal of appeal and issues ruling without deciding on costs.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 767/93
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia noted the withdrawal of the appeal and issued a ruling acknowledging this action. The appellant had withdrawn the appeal directly to the court after the first-instance judgment was upheld by the appellate court. Since the court had not yet ruled on the appeal, the withdrawal was effective immediately, and the court issued a ruling without addressing the appellant's costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. odstavek 349. člen ZPP; 399. člen ZPP: A party may withdraw an appeal until the court issues a decision, and the withdrawal takes effect immediately upon receipt without requiring the opposing party's consent.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal supreme court procedure effectiveness of withdrawal costs of appeal civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odstavek 349. člen ZPP
399. člen ZPP
2. odstavek 158. člen ZPP
AI generated
Sodba III Ips 110/97
Contractor liable for defective flooring in casino per ZOR warranty rules despite project basis.
VSL sodba I Cpg 202/2000
Appeal dismissed; defendant failed to prove a barter agreement instead of a sales contract for goods.
VSM Sodba I Cpg 104/2023
Contractor dismissed claim for damages due to lack of causal link between environmental permit issues and contract termination.
VSL sodba II Cp 2132/2004
Appeal dismissed; contract for indefinite term can end by mutual agreement, invalidating unilateral termination claims.
VSK sodba in sklep I Cpg 67/2007
Court partially allows appeal for lack of reasoning on damages but upholds statute of limitations ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Umik revizije se vzame na znanje.

[JEDRO]

O reviziji tožene stranke revizijsko sodišče do dneva prejema umika še ni odločilo. Zato je izdalo samo sklep, s katerim je umik revizije vzelo na znanje.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku in toženi stranki naložilo plačilo 565.785,00 SIT s pripadajočimi zamudnimi obrestmi. Pritožbeno sodišče je zavrnilo pritožbo tožene stranke in prvostopno sodbo potrdilo.

Proti drugostopni sodbi je tožeča stranka dne 4.5.1993 vložila revizijo.

Tožeča stranka je nato z vlogo, vloženo neposredno pri sodišču, dne 15.4.1994 umaknila revizijo.

Po 2. odstavku 349. člena ZPP, ki se uporablja tudi v revizijskem postopku (399. člen), lahko stranka, dokler sodišče ne izda odločbe, umakne pravno sredstvo. Izjava o umiku učinkuje takoj, ko jo sodišče prejme. Privolitev nasprotne stranke ni potrebna.

O reviziji tožene stranke revizijsko sodišče do dneva prejema umika še ni odločilo. Zato je izdalo samo sklep, s katerim je umik revizije vzelo na znanje.

Ker toženi stranki z umikom revizije niso nastali nobeni stroški (odgovora ni vložila), revizijsko sodišče tudi ni odločalo o njenih stroških revizijskega postopka (2. odstavek 158. člena ZPP).