Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Pr 12/94 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1994:I.PR.12.94 AI generated

Supreme Court transfers case to another court because the plaintiff is a judge of the original court.

Case Number Sklep I Pr 12/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia designated the Basic Court in Ljubljana to decide on this retrial case. The plaintiff, who is a judge at the Basic Court in Ljubljana, had filed a request for the return of confiscated property there. The court ruled that her position as a judge constitutes a significant reason to transfer the case to another competent court under Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act; A party's status as a judge of the court where the case is pending constitutes a significant reason for transferring the case to another competent court to ensure impartiality.

Keywords

AI generated
confiscated property return judicial impartiality court jurisdiction transfer Civil Procedure Act retrial proceedings significant reason competent court designation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
Sklep I R 141/2010
Supreme Court allows delegation of probate proceedings due to judge's dual role creating impartiality doubts.
Sklep I R 132/2007
Supreme Court transfers divorce property division case to another court due to judge's employment bias concerns.
Sklep I R 110/2005
Court allows transfer of case due to conflict of interest when plaintiff presides over the court.
Sklep I R 10/2011
Supreme Court transfers case to another district court due to judge's father being a party, ensuring impartiality.
VSRS Sklep I R 244/2025
Supreme Court transfers case to Maribor court due to appearance of bias from sister's employment there.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej nepravdni zadevi se določi Temeljno sodišče v Ljubljani.

[JEDRO]

Dejstvo, da je predlagateljica sodnica Temeljnega sodišča v ... je tehten razlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča na podlagi 68. člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Predlagateljica je vložila pri Temeljnem sodišču v ..., enoti v ... predlog za vrnitev podržavljenega premoženja.

Predsednik Temeljnega sodišča v ... je predlagal, da se za odločanje v tej nepravdni zadevi določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče. Kot razlog je navedel dejstvo, da je predlagateljica sodnica Temeljnega sodišča v ...

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po 68. členu ZPP lahko Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije na predlog stranke ali pristojnega sodišča odloči, da naj postopa v posamezni zadevi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče z njegovega območja, če za to obstajajo tehtni razlogi. Dejstvo, da je predlagateljica sodnica Temeljnega sodišča v ... je tehten razlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča na podlagi 68. člena ZPP. Zato je vrhovno sodišče predlogu ugodilo.