Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 12/2024 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2024:III.DOR.12.2024 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application against second instance judgment upholding trademark infringement claim.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 12/2024
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's application for permission to appeal the second instance judgment. The lower court ruled that the plaintiff's brandy did not infringe upon the defendant's registered EU and international trademarks. The review application was dismissed because the statutory conditions for granting permission to appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

367.a ZPP; 367.c ZPP: An application for permission to appeal is inadmissible if the specific statutory conditions for granting such permission are not fulfilled.

Keywords

AI generated
permission to appeal Code of Civil Procedure trademark infringement review application second instance judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a ZPP
367.c ZPP
AI generated
VSL Sodba V Cpg 157/2023
Appeal dismissed; court upheld trademark infringement ruling based on established legal precedents and good faith usage.
VSL Sodba in sklep V Cpg 345/2021
Slovenian court has jurisdiction over EU trademark dispute between Albanian parties due to defendant's participation.
VSRS Sklep III Ips 68/2018
Supreme Court allows trademark infringement claim by manufacturer against exclusive licensee distributor. The court reversed lower courts for dismissing the claim due to lack of legal interest.
VSL Sklep in sodba V Cpg 3/2020
Trademark infringement appeal dismissed; prior use rights override later registered marks for generic goods.
VSL Sodba in sklep V Cpg 606/2018
Trademark infringement claim dismissed; attorney fees reduced for non-independent services; appeal costs allocated by percentage.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožene stranke in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje, s katero je ugodilo ugotovitvenemu tožbenemu zahtevku, da uvoz, dajanje na trg, prodaja, ponujanje za prodajo in oglaševanje brandyja, ki ga je proizvedla tožnica in ki je z njenim soglasjem dan na trg Republike Slovenije ter je označen z napisom "SKËNDERBEU", "GJERGJ KASTRIOTI SKËNDERBEU" ali s slikovnim znakom, reproduciranem v izreku prvostopenjske sodbe, ne krši toženkinih znamk EU št. 014901003, 015683766, 015683744, 015683791, 015683808, 015683881, 015956634, 015978208, 015978224, 015978265, 016164808, 015201338, 017429267 in 017429325, registriranih pri Uradu EU za intelektualno lastnino, niti toženkine mednarodne znamke št. 848976, ki se nanaša na teritorij EU, registrirane pri Svetovni organizaciji za intelektualno lastnino.

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožena stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče na podlagi drugega odstavka 367.c člena ZPP predlog zavrnilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).