Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep I R 25/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:I.R.25.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court allows withdrawal of jurisdiction transfer request before final ruling under ZPP rules.

Case Number VSRS Sklep I R 25/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the withdrawal of a jurisdiction transfer request filed by the plaintiff. The plaintiff had submitted a request to transfer proceedings to the Supreme Court but subsequently withdrew it via a separate application before the court issued a decision. The court ruled that the withdrawal was valid because it occurred prior to the final ruling, applying the principle established in Article 334 of the Code of Civil Procedure by analogy to procedural requests.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 334 of the Code of Civil Procedure; A party may withdraw any legal remedy or procedural request, such as a jurisdiction transfer application, at any time before the court issues a final decision on that request.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of legal remedy jurisdiction transfer request Code of Civil Procedure procedural withdrawal preliminary procedural act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 334 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I R 96/2019
Supreme Court allows withdrawal of jurisdiction transfer request before final ruling on the request.
I R 124/2015
Supreme Court notes withdrawal of jurisdiction delegation request under ZPP Article 334 paragraph 2.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je predlog umaknjen.

[JEDRO]

V zvezi s pravnimi sredstvi velja, da lahko stranka vse dotlej, dokler sodišče ne izda odločbe o pravnem sredstvu, to pravno sredstvo umakne. Po analogiji velja enako glede predlagalnega akta, kakršen je predlog za delegacijo pristojnosti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Pred Okrajnim sodiščem v Kopru je v teku pravdni postopek zaradi motenja posesti P 20/2022.

2. Tožnika sta vložila predlog za prenos pristojnosti, nakar sta ga z vlogo s 23. 3. 2022 umaknila.

3. V zvezi s pravnimi sredstvi velja, da lahko stranka vse dotlej, dokler sodišče ne izda odločbe o pravnem sredstvu, to pravno sredstvo umakne (drugi odstavek 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP). Po analogiji velja enako glede predlagalnega akta, kakršen je predlog za delegacijo o pristojnosti. 1

4. Tožnika sta predlog za prenos pristojnosti umaknila, preden je Vrhovno sodišče o njem odločilo, zato je to sklenilo, kot izhaja izreka tega sklepa.

5. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, navedenem v uvodu odločbe. Odločitev je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).

1 Primerjaj sklepa VS RS I R 96/2019 z dne 8. 8. 2019 in I R 124/2015 z dne 5. 11. 2015.