Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep I Cp 12/2020 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2020:I.CP.12.2020.1 AI generated

Court rejects correction request for procedural error, ruling correction institute not for changing decisions.

Case Number VSL Sklep I Cp 12/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court rejected the opposing party's request for a corrective order regarding a procedural error in the filing date. The party argued the appeal was filed on October 21, 2019, rather than the recorded October 22, 2019. The court held that the correction institute under Article 328 of the Civil Procedure Act is strictly limited to obvious clerical errors and cannot be used to alter the substantive decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 328 of the Civil Procedure Act; The institute for correcting a judgment is not intended for changing the decision but only for obvious clerical errors.

Keywords

AI generated
corrective order procedural error clerical mistake Civil Procedure Act filing date judgment correction substantive decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 328 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSC Sklep II Cp 363/2020
Appeal dismissed as appeal against first-instance ruling was time-barred and appeal against appellate ruling was inadmissible.
VSL Sklep IV Cp 1175/2020
Appeal dismissed because unsigned appeal is incomplete and cannot be corrected under ZPP rules.
VSL Sklep I Cp 2769/2017
Appeal dismissed as untimely; court confirmed first-instance judgment became final after first appeal deadline expired.
VDSS Sklep Psp 188/2025
Appeal dismissed as late; court held deadline extended to next working day after Sunday expiration. Appeal filed after deadline was rejected.
VSL sklep I Cp 632/2015
Appeal dismissed because the appellant admitted filing the appeal late and failed to prove valid grounds for the delay.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog za izdajo popravnega sklepa se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Institut poprave odločbe ni namenjen spreminjanju odločitve.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Naslovno sodišče je s sklepom I Cp 12/2020 z dne 9. 9. 2020 zavrglo kot prepozno pritožbo nasprotne udeleženke. Nasprotna udeleženka predlaga izdajo popravnega sklepa. Trdi, da je bila pritožba vložena pravočasno, in sicer 21. 10. 2019 in ne 22. 10. 2019, kot je bilo ugotovljeno v pritožbenem postopku.

2. Predlog ni utemeljen.

3. Skladno s 328. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju: ZPP) se lahko s popravnim sklepom popravijo napake v imenih in številkah ter druge očitne pisne in računske pomote, pomanjkljivosti glede oblike in neskladnost prepisa sodbe z izvirnikom. Zatrjevana napaka ne predstavlja očitne pomote skladno s citiranim členom, zato sodišče druge stopnje popravnega sklepa ne more izdati. Institut poprave odločbe namreč ni namenjen spreminjanju odločitve. Glede na navedeno je bilo treba na podlagi 328. člena ZPP zavrniti predlog nasprotne udeleženke za popravo sklepa.