Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 547/2020 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2020:II.DOR.547.2020 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal request as first-instance revocation of will was granted.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 547/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the applicants' request for permission to appeal the second-instance judgment. The first instance court had granted the request to revoke a will dated April 24, 2013, which the second instance court upheld. The court rejected the appeal because the statutory conditions for allowing an appeal under Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 367.c of the Code of Civil Procedure: A request for permission to appeal is inadmissible if the conditions for granting such permission are not fulfilled.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure permission to appeal revocation of will second instance judgment supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367.c of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 324 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSRS sodba II Ips 198/2015
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal upholding will revocation due to testator's dementia and lack of testamentary capacity.
VSL Sodba I Cp 757/2023
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance finding that the will's signature was not made by the testator.
VSL Sodba II Cp 2004/2023
Appeal dismissed; testament revoked due to testator's cognitive decline preventing understanding of complex will. Appeal dismissed; testament revoked due to testator's cognitive decline preventing understanding of complex will. Appeal dismissed; testament revoked due to testator's cognitive decline preventing understanding of complex will.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 32/2024
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request as legal requirements for revision are not met.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 312/2020
Supreme Court allows review to determine if a will by a vulnerable testator is void due to moral unacceptability.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku, da se oporoka, ki jo je naredila A. A. dne 24. 4. 2013, razveljavi.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo zavrnilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje potrdilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje toženca vlagata predlog za dopustitev revizije, v katerem Vrhovnemu sodišču zastavljata vprašanje, ali lahko sodišče v pravdnem postopku ključni dokaz (izvedensko mnenje izvedenca) najprej izvede le delno (pridobi zgolj pisno mnenje), nato pa po izvedbi vseh ostalih dokazov nadaljuje z njegovo izvedbo zgolj z ustno dopolnitvijo in po slednji na istem naroku glavno obravnavo zaključi.

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa prvi odstavek 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče zavrnilo predlog v skladu z drugim odstavkom 367.c člena ZPP.

6. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, ki je naveden v uvodu odločbe. Odločitev je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).